Losing the Big Picture: How Religion May Control Visual Attention

Atheists are smarter than Calvinists in Dutch Study. But, the Calvinists are quicker at identifying small shapes than the Atheists.

Despite the abundance of evidence that human perception is penetrated by beliefs and expectations, scientific research so far has entirely neglected the possible impact of religious background on attention. Here we show that Dutch Calvinists and atheists, brought up in the same country and culture and controlled for race, intelligence, sex, and age, differ with respect to the way they attend to and process the global and local features of complex visual stimuli: Calvinists attend less to global aspects of perceived events, which fits with the idea that people's attentional processing style reflects possible biases rewarded by their religious belief system.

The data:

i-22e39d2db39c61fea21a1c27be16fb75-atheist_calvinist.jpg

ResearchBlogging.orgIt is interesting that while the researchers tried to control for IQ, they obviously could not. They ended up with smarter atheists despite what I presume to have been herculean efforts.

Otherwise, I think this study is kinda funny... Both "ha ha" funny and "strange" funny. Don't you think?

You can see the original study here.

Lorenza S. Colzato, Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg, Bernhard Hommel (2008). Losing the Big Picture: How Religion May Control Visual Attention PLoS ONE, 3 (11) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003679

More like this

A dead ant infected with a parasitic Cordyceps fungus (David P. Hughes).A team of entomologists working in the Brazilian rain forest has discovered four new species of parasitic Cordyceps fungi, which infect insects and manipulate the behaviour of their hosts in order to disperse their spores as…
Yesterday, I wrote about this paper on chimpanzees learning (or not) to spit water into a tube to retrieve a peanut. I was so very sad to see that there were no supplementary materials included with the paper. No awesome videos of chimps spitting water into a tube to share with you. So I sent an…
Read the following text. As you read it, try to empty your mind. When you encounter grammatical errors or jargon that is impossible to understand, do not try to translate what you are reading. Rather, become one with the obscurity. Read slowly, thoughtlessly, with emptiness of purpose, as…
Read the following text. As you read it, try to empty your mind. When you encounter grammatical errors or jargon that is impossible to understand, do not try to translate what you are reading. Rather, become one with the obscurity. Read slowly, thoughtlessly, with emptiness of purpose, as…

3 points will pretty much never constitute a difference in any IQ scale, unless maybe the sample size is in the tens of thousands!

The fourth sentence in the Discussion:
As our groups were matched for sex, IQ, age, educational style and socio-economic situation we can rule out an account of our results in these terms.

The main conclusion I draw from the paper is that the Netherlands is awash with college-age atheist women. Now if you'll excuse me while I contact my travel agent...

By Virgil Samms (not verified) on 16 Nov 2008 #permalink

I think the IQ is swamping other factors.

The US army studied how people reacted to targets and concluded that higher IQs translated to slower reaction times. Evidently being smart speeds thinking but slows doing.

Intensive training that programmed in automatic reactions was able to counter this deficit. This has changed how soldiers are trained.