Lifehacker has a comparison of Chrome 4.0, Firefox 3.5, and Opera 10.
Firefox boots slowest, Opera fastest. Opera takes longest to load eight tabs, Chrome the least time. Chrome totally cooks on the JafaScript Test, while Opera and Fierefox are left way behind.
Chrome uses the most memory, Opera next, and Fierfox least. The Chrome memory use seems quite large.
Lifehacker comes down with an endorsement of Chrome. You should look at the details here.
For me? When I go "apt-get install chrome" nothing happens.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
This is one of four related posts:
Should You Install Ubuntu Linux?
Installing Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
How to use Ubuntu Unity
Things To Do After Installing Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
Some Linux/Ubuntu related books:
Ubuntu Unleashed 2016 Edition: Covering 15.10 and 16.04 (11th Edition)
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Desktop:…
The Linux Journal Readers' Choice Awards are out with the current issue. Let's talk about some of them.
The number one distribution was, as usual Ubuntu. But, Ubuntu only got 16 percent, with Debian coming in second at 14.1 percent. So, one could say that Debian is strong since Ubuntu is based on…
NEW: Very first look at Ubuntu Linux 15.04 Vivid Vervet Beta Mate Flavor
See: Ubuntu Unleashed
Here is a list of things to do after you have installed Ubuntu 14.10 Utopic Unicorn.
There is some discussion of whether or not you should upgraded to 14.10 here, but the short version is, for most people…
See here to see why you might want to install the Mate flavor of Ubuntu 14.10.
Then, install it and consider doing these things. Get your system up to date. Yes, yes, you just installed it but that install image was old(ish). Update and upgrade now:
First, you probably want to open the Software…
If you go to the Chrome site and click "download", you get a .deb file. "dpkg -i" it, and you're in.
Chrome is still Alpha. It's a Good Thing that apt-get doesn't find it, because it still lacks lots of features you probably think are essential, and they're mainly interested in finding out what makes it crash. As my brother-in-law at Google points out, "It's not about you."
To me what is worst is that it insists on using ugly default or page-specified fonts instead of the beautiful "Linux Libertine" that Firefox is willing to use if I tell it.
Yeah, I do actually have installed, but I'm not quite into the paradigm yet.
Greg, you might be interested in Swiftweasel since you're running Ubuntu. It turns out that Firefox runs faster in Wine than natively. The Windows builds are profile-guide optimized for your processor, but the Linux builds in Ubuntu aren't by default.
The Swiftweasel Project is simply a guy who runs the 2-hour PGO Firefox compile for various instruction set architectures and rebrands it as Swiftweasel. Indistinguishable from Firefox, minus the fact that it's optimized for your particular CPU.
What I should REALLY do is to compile all my software that would be fun.
I wonder, though, if swiftweasel would close the gab these stats indicate.
When loading sessions with >50 tabs Opera (9.64) is much faster than Firefox (3).
I've been using a special version of Firefox 3.5 (Shiretoko) on Ubuntu 9.04 while the standard version is continuing development.
Unfortunately, I think this is the case for several programs whose developers continue to focus on the Windows platform almost exclusively.
I think "Crossover Chromium" might be a similarly good idea for those who want to try out Google's Chromium browser in Linux.
I've found that Google Earth operates much more smoothly within a virtual machine than it does natively in Linux. I understand it also works using wine, so I may have to give that a try too.
Google Chrome will update automatically with security updates. Crossover chromium, as with anything that is "crossover," is "wine" but with some help to make it atually work. I've had good luck with earlier versions of crossover chromium and with crossover in general. The current version is still "proof of concept" but then gain sometimes I think Firefox is too, and IE is always "proof of the concept that you are a moron for using this sucky software"
I have not played with virtual machines on my linux box, partly because it would involve buying a copy of Windows.
Oh; wait a second. No, I'm not running any virtual machines. That was just a virtual thought experiment.