There might be an HIV vaccine.

... this is not close to perfect, but an experimental mix of two previously tested but ineffective vaccines appears to have at least a 31 percent prevention rate based on one recent trial. The story is written up here.

Tags

More like this

The bird flu news hasn't been that good this week. New outbreaks in Afghanistan, Kuwait, Vietnam's previously quiet north, continuing infestations in Russia, and human cases in Egypt and Laos (although confusion over the Egyptian case) (see rundown in CEDRAP News here and here). How about some good…
"If the president's [budget] proposal is enacted similar to what he recommended, it will have a chilling effect on abstinence education across the country...We're in a race against time to keep these people in business" So says Leslie Unruh, rightwing nutjob extraordinaire (and a driving force…
A critical aspect of both evidence-based medicine (EBM) and science-based medicine (SBM) is the randomized clinical trial. Ideally, particularly for conditions with a large subjective component in symptomatology, the trial should be randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. As Kimball…
After I reported this recent and interesting research paper about urinary tract inflictions, a number of conversations broke out on that post, on my facebook page, and via email, and some of these conversations raised the question of cranberry juice and whether the idea that it prevents, reduces,…

The article says that 51 out of 8,197 people who got the vaccine became infected with HIV, while 74 of 8,198 people in the control group got the disease. I'm not a statistician, but those infection rates seem so low that it's hard to draw a conclusion from them.

The difference between 74 and 51 is not overwhelming impressive, that is true, but given this sample size, I get a p-value of under 0.05 using Fisher's Exact test. So you wouldn't want to build a bridge with these data, but you wouldn't want to give up the study either.