Religious right to judge: "Shut Up."
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The Discovery Institute clearly recognizes that its purpose is not science but public relations. It is incredibly obvious that their strategy at the moment is to sell the ridiculous spin that the Dover lawsuit will oppress scientists and forbid them from discussing or researching ID. Here's the…
It's not over until the Supremes rule on any appeal, but yesterday U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper became my new hero when she issued a ruling that ...
...severely limited the Navy's ability to use mid-frequency sonar on a training range off the Southern California coast, ruling that the…
Chad Orzel says Support the National Center for Science Education:
I try not to do any shilling for political groups on the blog, but I'll make an exception for the National Center for Science Education. Why? Three reasons:
1) They do good and important, if not always glamorous work, supporting the…
Greg Laden suggests A multiplicity of strategies is better than infighting when addressing creationism and related problems. That seems reasonable, and I'm intrigued by his diagnosis for the conflict over accommodationism and New Atheism:
I have always thought, naively and probably incorrectly,…
Perkins had his two stupid sentences that he was told to spew and he did, over and over and over and over again.
What a tool he is...LOL
CNN does a huge disservice to its audience by allowing two or more guests to speak at once. At times in this vid, all three of these guys were talking over each other.
Unbearable.
A simple solution: microphone switches and a director with a brain.
What I could tell of Perkins' position seems to be consistent with this rule of thumb: "Organisations with the word 'family' in their titles are not to be trusted".
Disgruntled, you've been reading my mail.
Civil discourse, despite unfair accusations, does not value volume and the sheer number of words that come spilling out like the effluent at the end of a sewer pipe. Rather it is the screamers, the non-stoppers with fingers in ears that value such. Such is of great value to those with no positive or provable points to make. Allows 'em to avoid answering direct questions while pounding their latest mantra into the ground, much to the delight of their acolytes.
How disappointing and unsurprising. How drab.
Disgruntled @ #2:
With the notable exception of the Kaiser Family Foundation - which, admittedly, has 'family' in its name for different reasons.