God, Darwin ... or Both?

Speaking of Accommodationism and New Atheism and stuff, check out this 10 year old discussion:

More like this

Having been on hiatus for a couple of months has made me forget my obligation for self-promotion via the blog, but I should note one fast approaching public appearance: I'll be at the University of Waterloo next weekend, where they are celebrating the opening of their shiny new Quantum and Nano…
Not to delve into the accommodationism wars again, but this claim is just silly. Ophelia Benson comments on Michael Shermer commenting on Jerry Coyne commenting on Michael Shermer, and objects to Shermer's claim that "the right way to respond to theists and/or theism⦠is simple: there is no one '…
... In which I narrow the gulf between two allied factions enough that with a running start you can jump across ... maybe. It has been suggested that Accommodationism is "a more moderate atheist perspective on the nature of religion and science."1 In this view, religion and science are not…
Greg Laden suggests A multiplicity of strategies is better than infighting when addressing creationism and related problems. That seems reasonable, and I'm intrigued by his diagnosis for the conflict over accommodationism and New Atheism: I have always thought, naively and probably incorrectly,…

Meh. I did not like all that much what Dr. Scott said then. There was too much accommodation in her talk.

By NewEnglandBob (not verified) on 13 Jul 2010 #permalink

Assumptions are taken on faith?
No. We make assumptions knowingly, and we can always go back to reexamine them.

Remember this old one? "Assume a spherical cow." That's not faith. That's an assumption.