Deborah Rhodes: A tool that finds 3x more breast tumors, and why it's not available to you

Please see Orac's (as usual, massively verbose) take on this subject. Bear in mind that breast cancer is his research topic.

Also bear in mind that not long ago he lost a relative to breast cancer.

By D. C. Sessions (not verified) on 13 Jan 2011 #permalink

D.C.,

Do you have a link to Orac on the subject, or useful keywords? I did a couple of quick searches and got nothing.

By Paul W., OM (not verified) on 13 Jan 2011 #permalink

She doesn't address the issue of false positives, although offhand, it looks like this technology would be less prone to them.

By Uncle Glenny (not verified) on 13 Jan 2011 #permalink

OMENS OF DEATH: the end of atheism - only the blind and deaf can deny it... an example and warning of the fate of those who try to divide people....At least we're on the same page...Serves Em Right, eh, Randi....

By Dave Mabus (not verified) on 13 Jan 2011 #permalink

It's an interesting approach for selective screening for tumors in general (using radionuclide imaging), and it's already being used for some tests (the thyroid tumors come to mind), just not for breast cancer.