80% of Democrats Can't Help Themselves And Would Support Palin

Just because, I mean, wouldn't you want to know who she'd appoint to the supreme court?

More like this

Good ol' Gribbit repeats this one ridiculous argument that is par for the course among the STACLU crowd: the notion that the ACLU intentionally files cases in "ACLU friendly districts":
Marty Lederman has an essay on Jack Balkin's page arguing that the recess appointment of John Bolton as our Ambassador to the UN is unconstitutional, as are almost all such appointments made not just by Bush but
I received an email today that brings up a curious decision by Lund University: they have appointed a new head of the university who seems to have a few bats in the belfry, and there is some concern that they may be rabid.

I love this "quote" (at around 1:30):

Having Palin in office would be like a 4-year long white-water rafting trip. It might kill us, but if it doesn't we'll end up with a bunch of crazy-ass photos.

I would enthusiastically support her, as long as the endeavor in question is a long walk off a short pier.

By Rorschach (not verified) on 20 Jan 2011 #permalink

I support her to run for president so that a) I can have a laugh, and b) Obama gets re-elected.

If I change my party affiliation to GOP, can I vote for her in the primaries?

She couldn't possibly win POTUS, could she?

By Rich Wilson (not verified) on 20 Jan 2011 #permalink

Rich, she CAN win POTUS, because Americans ARE that stupid...

Let the fat lady sing already -- so we can pack the tents and go home...

By Starskeptic (not verified) on 21 Jan 2011 #permalink

Michele Bachmann is in Iowa as we speak. In a head to head with Obama, she gets 32 percent of the national vote.

Add a liberal third party candidate ... someone who can play on all this whinging about how Obama has done nothing ... and 5 or 10 percent of the vote gets split out. Blacks stay home, teabaggers show up. You've got X in the white house, where X = some combination of Bachmann, Palin and Huckabee.

End of civilization right there.

"End of civilization right there."

probably not, because the "spoiler" candidate would be only presidential. since that candidate would attract those obama-disenfranchised voters to the booth, they'd vote for congresscritters who wouldn't be repug.
IOW, pushing congress further from repug.

By Lyndon Larouch… (not verified) on 21 Jan 2011 #permalink

Greg Laden: Add a liberal third party candidate ... someone who can play on all this whinging about how Obama has done nothing ... and 5 or 10 percent of the vote gets split out.

Assuming you don't also have a Conservative fourth party candidate, to give a familiar recipe. US Civil War probably would only annihilate US civilization; the economic collapse would grossly inconvenience the rest of the planet, but probably not end civilization outright.

62%. who knew there were so many desperate voters who have developed tolerance to ipecac?

i like the stupidly blandly stupid bland tv slogans. also the bleached blond character has a Hispanic surname :-)

By Lyndon Larouch… (not verified) on 21 Jan 2011 #permalink

certainly an *underground* border wall along Canadian border would
a.) prevent frost heave damage.
b.) stop those Mexicans from tunneling under the border wall.
I'm going to write to the palin campaign's chain email list to have them incorporate my intelligent suggestions into our platform.

By Sudden attack … (not verified) on 21 Jan 2011 #permalink