But at the same time say that Obama is doing it wrong:
The campaign’s plan cited four priorities – giving NASA focus, working with the international community, increasing the nation’s capacity to defend its assets in space and easing trade limits on foreign sales of American “space goods.” Romney did not suggest increased space spending — his budget plan would force cuts in domestic programs, including space — but on increased reliance on commercial firms to get Americans and their goods into space. That mirrors the Obama administration’s plan.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Senate Republicans are again trying to ram through an Affordable Care Act replacement that threatens the health and well-being of millions of Americans. It’s shameful. But don’t take my word for it. Let’s look at what people who actually work in health care are saying about the Graham-Cassidy-…
In late July, while many of us were preoccupied with Republican Senators’ attacks on healthcare, the Trump administration released its first regulatory agenda (technically, the Current Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions). These routine updates are published so the public can see…
David Goldston, writing in Nature, echoes a point I have been trying to make about the science provisions of the economic stimulus package. He lists some reasons why scientists should be wary of getting our funding this way:
First, being included in the stimulus measure could turn science spending…
Most public health advocates are probably already aware that U.S. funds for international AIDS relief come with counterproductive strings attached â specifically, requirements that one-third of HIV prevention money go to abstinence-only education and that entities receiving PEPFAR grants explicitly…
This really does point to the main message that the Tea Party GOP has been sending since 2008: "Obama/Liberals are always wrong." No matter what issue, and with hardly any reasonable fix.
Meh, I don't believe it. The thing is to *say* you'll do what Obama's doing but do things 'better' - of course in Ryan's world, 'better' means with $0 per year funding.
Well who do YOU want to Be doing all the NASA-ing? Highly paid, highly Trained professionals with decades of experience? Hah! Typical Fucking liberal answer. You don't Need Professionals to build A space shuttle. I Propose an All Volunteer Space Program!
/sarcasm. (Though volunteer astronauting would be sweet)
Better. Faster. Cheaper. Pick any two.
MadScientist,
It’s all in how you cross your toes when saying the majikal words. Simple really.