Masters of the Planet

Yesterday I wrote about Chris Stringer's modified version of human evolution. Today, let's have a look at Ian Tattersall's new book, Masters of the Planet: The Search for Our Human Origins (Macsci). Tatersall's boo, like Sringer's, is a good overview of the newer evidence in the constantly changing field, but he goes back earlier and provides a much broader context for human evolution. His main thesis is that the features that made modern humans unique have two main characteristics: 1) they were sufficient and causal in the process of making that one species "master of the planet" and 2) the transition to fully modern form, with respect to those features, is relatively late. Tattersall argues for a late and rather sudden development of symbolic abilities and language (I disagree with this) and seems to agree with Klein in something like a "single gene" theory describing this transition as sudden and dramatic. So, I basically disagree with his thesis, but if you want a good source to find out about the "symbolic explosion" version of modern humans, this is accessible and the documentation is pretty thorough.

More like this

Chris Stringer's new book, Lone Survivors: How We Came to Be the Only Humans on Earth, attempts to reconcile the age-old conflict between the "Multiregional" and "Out of Africa" hypotheses of Modern Human origins. Stringer has long been identified with the "Out of Africa" hypothesis, and his…
One of the most important evolutionary transitions in human prehistory was the rise of modern humans (Homo sapiens) from earlier hominids. A newly reported fossil from Tanzania provides an important new data point necessary to understand this transition. Homo erectus/ergaster probably gave rise to…
The first part of this documentary, including the preface and the first several minutes of the main body of the work, should be deleted. The writers and producers who put that part together should be captured, gutted, eviscerated, and their dried and salted remains staked to the front entrance of…
I'm excited about Glenn Beck's "I Have a Nightmare" Rally in DC this weekend (I'm sure my relatives in the area are not). Anyway, links. Science: What the Egg Recall Says About Our Food Safety System (a surveillance success and regulatory failure)Tara Parker-Pope and the New York Times Well Blog…

You should replace the word "thesis" with "hypothesis." The word "thesis" in science is very strong, and it misused everyday. Tattersall correctly uses the word "hypothesis" where appropriate, whether speaking about his own, or current ones in the field regarding different aspects of the evolution of the human species. We need to be careful with misusing the word "theory," because when it's used correctly, people need to understand how powerful that word is in science. Misusing it makes people think that a "theory" is just an educated guess- a statement of supposition based on what has been observed. By scientific definition, that is a hypothesis. That is why some people brush of Evolutionary Theory as "just a guess," because they think the word "theory" means it's "just a guess," when in fact, it couldn't be further from the truth. Please edit this post. Take it from a scientist.

By Roseanne Gammello (not verified) on 04 Feb 2016 #permalink

I am well aware of the meaning of these terms, and I think I chose widely! Thanks for the run down, though. :)