Google+ vs Facebook vs Twitter vs Pinterest

More like this

For now. When it comes down to it, benevolent dictatorship resting on a perfectly anarchistic base is the only way to go. Democracy is too easily bought. Free Market Forces do not make everything all nice and efficient and stuff. Wherever information can be OpenSource and OpenAccess it should be…
People on Google+ are discussing what to do with their circles. Here, I'm not going to explain what circles are; I wish merely to record for the moment what I'm doing with them on my account for others to consider and criticize. If you don't know what circles are, join Google+ and find out, and…
From Rob Pike Dear Rob-- As Dennis's siblings, Lynn, John, and Bill Ritchie--on behalf of the entire Ritchie family--we wanted to convey to all of you how deeply moved, astonished, and appreciative we are of the loving tributes to Dennis that we have been reading. We can confirm what we keep…
I'm on Google+. After a couple days of playing with it, I haven't quite identified what it is for, or at least how I'm going to use it differently from twitter or facebook, but so far I am generally impressed - it's easy, intuitive, and fast. It also allows you a level of selective privacy that -…

G+ is so much better than the competition - also Happy New Year Greg :)

By Doug Alder (not verified) on 31 Dec 2012 #permalink

And Beta was better than VHS. Didn't matter in the end though.

Yes, beta was better technology. It was a smaller cartridge, and it did not pull the tape out and wrap it around the drive wheels, so there was far less damage to the tapes Every professsional organisation such as tv studios used beta.

In google+ can you publish on a friend profile? Or just can share on your own profile?
sorry I really dont speak english, im trying

But betamax was a standard that could only be used with royalties paid to Sony(same as Bluray).. Why pay more to produce the better technology when you can use some almost as good for much cheaper..