How do you tell the women from the men in Copper-Age Eastern Europe?

Apparently, the women have jugs.

No, seriously. In a certain archaeological culture known from the vicinity of Prague, male and female burials are distinguished by the mode of burial and the artifacts. The males tend to be buried with their heads towards the west and along with various weapons. Females, on the other hand, tend to be buried with their heads towards the east and surrounded by domestic jugs.

This is interesting for many reasons (to an archaeologist, at least) but even more interesting is the possible discovery of a transgendered person's burial. This is a male skelton buried in female style. (This story was first reported in 2011, but is being talked about again lately. Which is OK because we really don't need to ignore or devalue everything that happened more than 72 hours ago, right?)

I quickly add the following caveats:

1) I've never seen an archaeological culture where the artifacts matched with the burial practices perfectly. For a number of reasons, what ends up happening under ground is not culture-normative. So, the generalization I provided above is only a generalization; and

2) The skeleton is presumably sexed (that's the word we use for assigning sex... if you are dead, and a bone, an archaeologist or physical anthropologist will sex you) using the usual techniques of identifying several markers on the skull and pelvis, and a few other measurements, and overall robusticity. This can be wrong. It works, but it can be wrong a lot.

Also, this is not terribly uncommon. Well, it's uncommon, but it happens. I think it is more common to find probable females in male settings, though.

The story is reported here.

More like this

[A repost from gregladen.com, unmodified] There is a ceremonial burial in Britain .. ceremonial because it has some red stuff smeared on bone ... that has now bee dated to a few thousand years earlier than previously thought (to ca 25,000 years old).
Police officers in northern Scotland have been accused of vandalising a Bronze Age site through ignorance after they removed bones and textiles from the 4,000-year-old burial chamber, apparently because they thought they were investigating a crime scene.
A new paper in the Norwegian journal Viking offers exciting news a

And of course, there's also the problem that what we think is culture-normative is based on a very limited sample - as more site as investigated, the picture almost always turns out to be more complicated than we initially thought.