How do you tell the women from the men in Copper-Age Eastern Europe?

Apparently, the women have jugs.

No, seriously. In a certain archaeological culture known from the vicinity of Prague, male and female burials are distinguished by the mode of burial and the artifacts. The males tend to be buried with their heads towards the west and along with various weapons. Females, on the other hand, tend to be buried with their heads towards the east and surrounded by domestic jugs.

This is interesting for many reasons (to an archaeologist, at least) but even more interesting is the possible discovery of a transgendered person's burial. This is a male skelton buried in female style. (This story was first reported in 2011, but is being talked about again lately. Which is OK because we really don't need to ignore or devalue everything that happened more than 72 hours ago, right?)

I quickly add the following caveats:

1) I've never seen an archaeological culture where the artifacts matched with the burial practices perfectly. For a number of reasons, what ends up happening under ground is not culture-normative. So, the generalization I provided above is only a generalization; and

2) The skeleton is presumably sexed (that's the word we use for assigning sex... if you are dead, and a bone, an archaeologist or physical anthropologist will sex you) using the usual techniques of identifying several markers on the skull and pelvis, and a few other measurements, and overall robusticity. This can be wrong. It works, but it can be wrong a lot.

Also, this is not terribly uncommon. Well, it's uncommon, but it happens. I think it is more common to find probable females in male settings, though.

The story is reported here.

More like this

My Wulfheodenas homie David Huggins asked me a good question. ”Shield maidens! True or False? Okay, that was a bit general, but female 'warrior' graves, symbolic or otherwise?”. I take this to mean “Were there female warriors in Northern Europe AD 500-1000?” Let's start by examining why everyone…
In archaeology, we distinguish osteological sex from artefact gender. Osteo-sex is with very few exceptions (odd chromosomal setups) the same thing as what your genitals are like. Artefact gender is the material correlate of a role you play according to the conventions of your time: e.g. whether…
We know all too little about the biology and behaviour of the pterosaurs, the amazing, often bizarre flying reptiles of the Mesozoic Era. Most of our ideas - about feeding behaviour, locomotion, physiology and social and sexual behaviour - are inferences based on bones, or inferences based on…
Dean Snow was one of my two advisors in undergraduate school. I have fond memories of all six months of college. But that's another story. Anyway, several years ago, Dean got wind of the research showing that humans exhibit sexual dimorphism in the ratios of the middle digits of the hand. It is…

And of course, there's also the problem that what we think is culture-normative is based on a very limited sample - as more site as investigated, the picture almost always turns out to be more complicated than we initially thought.