Government Responsibility in Addressing Weather Disasters

The US National Weather Service does a pretty good job at predicting weather, but there are problems. In fact, we are behind compared to other nations, and parts of our infrastructure is deteriorating. Paul Douglas has been telling people for some time that we need to pay attention to our aging satellite system, and here Kate Sheppard talks about the slow but steady development of legislation to advance our storm prediction abilities:

More like this

Paul Douglas from Weather Nation on weather whiplash, the latest on the Polar Vortex, Sochi weather problems. And, the 30-30-30 rule, which is good to know. Published on Jan 24, 2014 "It seems like the weather, increasingly, is getting stuck." Meteorologist Paul Douglas explains this weather…
Today's must read, from the Washington Post: The U.S. government is cutting back on environmental science. The government's ability to understand and predict hurricanes, drought and climate changes of all kinds is in danger because of deep cuts facing many Earth satellite programs and major delays…
Trending wetter with time: weather never moves in a straight line, but data from NOAA NCDC shows a steady increase in the percentage of the USA experiencing extreme 1-day rainfall amounts since the first half of the 20th century. Photograph: NOAA NCDC My Apology to Paul Douglas I admit that I do a…
This weekâs edition is devoted to blogging about election results: the performance of state-level ballot measures, what the new Congress looks like, speculation about cabinet picks, and priorities for President-Elect Obama and the 111th Congress. Suggested Policies and PrioritiesStudents from the…

Really severe ones help reduce the surplus population (takers) while providing profit incentives to job creators during reconstruction.

People who don't like it should either live in storm-proof homes, or take a private jet to Aspen or Cabo.

By Buck Field (not verified) on 30 Apr 2014 #permalink

I sincerely hope Buck Field is being sarcastic here...

Wordpress didn't seem to like the formatting of my "Libertublican Mode: Off" caveat apparently, and snipped it without my permission, then proceeded to post the entry without it, and offered no editing option...so the comment went out not as clear as intended.

There exist, however, a large swath who view the world through a lens fairly close to that.

By Buck Field (not verified) on 30 Apr 2014 #permalink

In reply to by Marco (not verified)

Indeed, such people exist. So be careful with sarcastic comments, as some people may think you mean it (and then agree with you).

(very) Occasionally, such agreement leads to productive discussion, such as when I've encountered people sincerely interested in how we know the moon landings weren't faked.

By Buck Field (not verified) on 30 Apr 2014 #permalink

In reply to by Marco (not verified)

Try discussing economic or climate related matters at zerohedge....

If that doesn't scare you, nothing will...

By Flakmeister (not verified) on 30 Apr 2014 #permalink

Your tone is enough to scare me already! :)

By Buck Field (not verified) on 30 Apr 2014 #permalink

In reply to by Flakmeister (not verified)

Buck Field -
Your first comment was a fine example of sarcasm and needed no further explanation.

By cosmicomics (not verified) on 30 Apr 2014 #permalink