More Eco-Irony

After the post on Threatened Trees, a friend passed along this photo of Endangered Species Research journals, which come wrapped in heavy plastic (they are printed on acid-free paper, however).

i-88578c2291cf9cbdb0d3b41775970e4c-ESR-thumb-500x375-24071.jpg

More like this

About two weeks ago I wrote an entry on what I hated about scientific journals. I intentionally did not include the issue of public access to publicly financed research, but it came up in the comment section. Interestingly Maxine, an editor at Nature, replied: On the access problem mentioned here…
How's that for a frightening figure? 1/4 of all mammals on earth are on the IUCN's newest "Red List," animals threatened with extinction - that's 1,141 of them, at least, with 188 being 'critically endangered.' I say 'at least' because almost as many - 836 of them - are 'data deficient,' which…
Thursday, February 19 ScienceBlogger Bora Zivkovic from A Blog Around the Clock gave a presentation on open science as part of a panel discussion at Columbia University in New York City. The event, titled "Open Science: Good for Research, Good for Researchers?" was organized by the Scholarly…
Some of you, dear readers, have probably wondered where I have been hiding these past few days. Well, besides being busy with teaching a conservation genetics course, I was also, unexpectedly, reading another book so I could publish the review here as soon as possible. Last Monday, Darksyde, co-…

There is no alternative.

I think the fine print on the end of the wrapper says, "No trees were harmed in the production of this wrapper." I receive a couple of magazines which can, for a small fee, be mailed in a plastic wrapper. I get them bare and they almost never have any damage.

By Jim Thomerson (not verified) on 19 Dec 2009 #permalink

Wasn't there already a post on being an ecodouche?