I did what you asked, I Googled Phil Jones, and I even provided a link to his latest work. I then asked you what your point was, to which you responded that there has been little to no warming for many years.
The only problem with that is that it would be impossible to draw that conclusion from the work cited. Indeed, it specifically says exactly the opposite. So I am going to ask you again, what was the point you were trying to make when you suggested that we google Phil Jones?
I think your quote about ideology says it all really. You have adopted such a blinkered ideological position that you even ignore the evidence that you provide. That pretty much sums up why people like you deserve nothing but contempt.
The data on page 32 from rahmstorf and foster is the first piece of interesting info you've brought to the discussion. I'm going to have to follow up on that with some of the denier web sites.
Further comment on the foster rahmstorf graph.
It's particularly curious that these various factors all worked together to result in a nice linear rise over some 30 years.
No need to waste 27 seconds. Look at the temp graph and tell if warming has stopped...
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/
2011? ;)
Likewise here fellow kooks
http://www.climate.gov/
Or you can google Phil Jones and obtain his perspective.
As long as you ignore the Daily Mail piece by David Rose, who is a known distorter of what people tell him. He even got Judith Curry upset.
Oh wait, that is the only source PaulinMI has...
So anyway Paul, I did what you suggested and Googled Phil Jones to obtain his perspective. Here is his latest work on the issue:
https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/gcos/apocXVII/presentations/14.2_CRUTEM4…
So just to be clear, what is the point that you are trying to make?
There has been very little or no warming for many years, pick your point. And the kooks are grasping at straws instead of accepting reality.
It's ok, ideology will do that.
Linear thinking in a logarithmic world.
Again.
Wow, pauline sure is edumacated, look at the big words he uses:
Too bad he doesn't have a clue as to what they mean.
Ian,
You are a scoundrel, shoo fly.
Paul's looking in the mirror AGAIN!
Paul
I did what you asked, I Googled Phil Jones, and I even provided a link to his latest work. I then asked you what your point was, to which you responded that there has been little to no warming for many years.
The only problem with that is that it would be impossible to draw that conclusion from the work cited. Indeed, it specifically says exactly the opposite. So I am going to ask you again, what was the point you were trying to make when you suggested that we google Phil Jones?
I think your quote about ideology says it all really. You have adopted such a blinkered ideological position that you even ignore the evidence that you provide. That pretty much sums up why people like you deserve nothing but contempt.
The data on page 32 from rahmstorf and foster is the first piece of interesting info you've brought to the discussion. I'm going to have to follow up on that with some of the denier web sites.
Further comment on the foster rahmstorf graph.
It's particularly curious that these various factors all worked together to result in a nice linear rise over some 30 years.