Would it have looked something like this?
And how would Thomas Jefferson have countered?
(Hat tip to Spinning Clio.)
More like this
Ya gotta love it. Whether it be the Virgin Mary under a freeway overpass on W. Fullerton Avenue in Chicago or on a window in Perth Amboy, NJ, or the face of Jesus on a shell, on the wall of a shower, on a sand dune, a potato chip, or (my personal favorite) a pierogi, it would seem that human…
...or at least the Cybermen would be more entertaining:
Now, if I could only see a Dalek episode redone this way. Imagine how the Daleks would sound.
(Hat tip: Jody.)
And while I'm doing the Sunday Doctor Who thing, who ya gonna call?
When you don't have time to write something substantive, what do you do?
Post YouTubes videos, of course!
Sadly, I can almost relate to this one (after all, thanks to BitTorrent, I have now seen all of the episodes from season two of the resurrected series, with David Tennant playing The Doctor…
Apparently, authors have been using reviews at Amazon.com to anonymously praise their own books and pan rival books. Who knew? It seems a glitch at Amazon's Canadian site revealed the names of all the anonymous reviewers. And yes, I checked and it's fixed now. I also checked Google's cache…
Tom Jefferson's evil plans.
Is anyone else picturing Dr. Evil here?
Actually, we don't need to wonder too hard about what Jefferson would've done. Because even with the limited media of the day, campaigns used to be a lot more negative than we often recall.
Jefferson backed a lot of anti-Adams propaganda leading up to the election (although often concealing his involvement), including paying James Callender to write some harsh anti-Adams material. This included calling Adams "a repulsive pedant," "one of the most egregious fools upon the planet," and, best of all, "a hideous hermaphroditical character which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman."
TJ would have been right at home with YouTube.
(Jefferson later made the mistake of not sufficiently obliging Callender's wishes, which resulted in Callender publishing in 1802 the first allegations about President Jefferson's illegitimate child with Sally Hemmings.)
Oddly, sometimes I have found myself wondering how some of today's TV talking heads would have fared in the days when men fought duels over insults. Would O'Reilly and Olberman shoot it out alongside Hamilton and Burr ?
But getting back to the topic... Would Jefferson have had to put up with "Gun boat veterans for truth" , or "do you really want a slave-owning Hemp-Grower in the Office of President ? Would Jefferson have hit back with something like: "Adams is a rabble-rouser and the son of the brewer"?
Hmm.. Closely related... would Franklin have published his own science blog ?
In The Wealth of Nations (published in 1776) Adam Smith called political pamphlets "the wretched offspring of falsehood and venality"
Remarkable how little changes isn't it?
I'm also reminded of the 1824 campaign song for John Quincy Adams, which made apocalyptic allegations not unlike this video's, with regard to what would happen if Andrew Jackson were elected President:
Slavery's comin', knavery's comin',
Wonder's comin;, plunder's comin',
Jobbin's comin;, robbing's comin'
If John Quincy not be comin'!
Tears are comin', fears are coming,
Plague and pestilence are comin',
Hatin's comin;, Satan's comin',
If John Quincy not be comin'!