Houston Chronicle on Political Manipulation of Science

In a nutshell:

"This administration's political appointees might be unique in their contempt for government scientists and the empiric process that shapes their work."

Read "Frog by frog." Hat-tip to Michael Halpern

More like this

Maybe the biggest science story of 2008 is that science will be back in government in 2009. In a way it is a commentary on how far we have fallen that the appointment of distinguished scientists to important posts in government is a story at all. It should be a given. But for eight years -- and…
The wisest line? At 0:56: "we want to hear what is actually happening, not what people are saying about it". That is the problem with journalism (all media, not just TV) in a nutshell: the #1 reason journalists are very low in the polls of trustworthiness in comparison with many other professions…
Many Republicans and most Democrats in Congress seem to agree on at least one thing: President Bush is full of crap. Not about Iraq. Virtually all Republicans disagree with the rest of us on that. No, what they agree on is that the federal government should expand, not deep six, the Children's…
Members of the public health community are aware of many of the ways the Trump administration and the 115th Congress are hindering and reversing evidence-based actions for public health – from an executive order requiring agencies to scrap two regulations each time they create a new one to…

That's good. Could be shorter and perhaps sharper, however:

This administration might be unique in its contempt for scientists and the empiric process that shapes their work.

Or just:

This administration might be unique in its contempt.

I'm tempted to replace the "might be" with "is" but will leave that debate to the historians.