Feeling Dumbfounded

I'm Google dependent, just like all the rest of you. But I heard about a new search function that's going live today, and I've been checking it out. (Full Disclosure: I heard from a friend here in D.C. who's involved in promoting this search.) The name is catchy--Dumbfind. It doesn't replace Google, and it takes some getting used to, but it seems to allow for better sifting of results for those who know exactly what they're looking for through the use of tags that organize the content, as explained here and here. As a bunch of science geeks, I figured that some of you folks might want to give it a try. Let me know how it works for you.

Tags

More like this

A bunch of people have sent me links to an article about MapReduce. I've hesitated to write about it, because the currently hyped MapReduce stuff was developed, and extensively used by Google, my employer. But the article is really annoying, and deserves a response. So I'm going to be absolutely…
Continuing with the tradition from last two years, I will occasionally post interviews with some of the participants of the ScienceOnline2010 conference that was held in the Research Triangle Park, NC back in January. See all the interviews in this series here. You can check out previous years'…
Actually, Journalists do take some of the blame for the death of newspapers: But why is the business model dying? Competition is a factor, and blogs are obviously part of that mix. But again, if I'd started a business and someone else opened up down the street and offered a more appealing product,…
Once again, there's a silly article somewhere, and everyone hammers me with requests to write about it. It's frankly flattering that people see this sort of nonsense, and immediately think of asking me about it - you folks are going to give me a swelled head! The article in question is a recent…

I just searched for "magicians toledo oh" All I got was a list of advertising sites. A useless result. Apparantly this isn't for the average user with common need for information. Or I'm too dumb to use it.

By melissa p (not verified) on 25 Jan 2006 #permalink

I'm Google Scholar dependent. It even finds obscure German articles, most immediately downloadable no less. And with citation links. You can get a sense of an entire research area in a one hour session, a process that used to take days or more.

For example, searching for pages related to Riemann's famous lecture Ãber die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen (On the Hypotheses which lie at the Foundations of Geometry) on Google, Google Scholar, and DumbFind, I'd have to say that the choice is clear.

By Steven Thomas Smith (not verified) on 24 Jan 2006 #permalink

Chris,

Apparently, ScienceBlogs' international character set isn't working properly [see the misrendered Ãber (Uber) above, ha-ha]. This is obviously very important for accurate reference to foreign language sources, as well as to headbangers that wish to cite Mötley Crüe, as well as Spinal Tapâunfortunately, n-umlaut and dotless-i cannot be rendered using HTML.

By Steven Thomas Smith (not verified) on 24 Jan 2006 #permalink