My oped is second only to a roundup of business news, as of 4 pm ET. See here.
The op-ed has generated some 440 comments, too, at last count. I wonder if we will hear anything further from Mr. Will....
UPDATE: Scratch that, as of 7 ET, it is the number one article on the website....
- Log in to post comments
More like this
[Update 10/18 8:30 am: Honestly, when I wrote this post last night, I could only access the first couple paragraphs of the op-ed in question. But now the link takes you to the full text. Could it be that my cries were heard?? Doubt it, but open access is always nice.]
In today's Wall Street Journal…
As any reader of this blog knows, I was for a while very critical of the Washington Post editorial page amid the George Will affair. Now, my view has changed.
Today the Post publishes, replete with links to many scientific sources, my op-ed answering three claims Will made in his now infamous "Dark…
When BEST first came out I said it was boring, because it just said what everyone knew already "Summary: the global temperature record is just what we thought it was". There was some soap opera thrown in for fun, but that didn't affect the science.
But now (New Global Temperature Data Reanalysis…
I'm told that some of the strongest reactions to our article have not been published...more on that at the end.
First, since Sunday's piece in the L.A. Times generated quite a lot of blog commentary, let me provide a brief (and necessarily incomplete) rundown--and have a little fun with it by…
If George Will doesn't respond to you after this, he's proven himself to be a coward.
Congrats, Chris! Very well written response. Thanks so much for putting forth the effort even though it seemed like there wasn't much of a chance that it would be published.
It seems all those congratulations you received before it was published were deserved. (Although you were right to urge people to not judge your article before reading it.)
Congratulations. It's a well written article, and reflects one of your qualities which I like; your reasonableness and ability to criticize without ad hominem attacks or extreme statements. Although I am sure that by now, and especially given the titles of your books, they have already painted you as a flag-waving leftists. Mission accomplished I say.
Based on the comments, I should also say you now need to buckle up for some hate mail (assuming you have not already received it)
Congratulations Chris. I do hope, however, that not many people will read the comments, because the ones on the last page, at this hour (Sunday 11.30 am) are pretty depressing. A lot of those people have a lot of time on their hands, apparently...
Have you read the Nature article on the state and decline of science journalism? Sadly it does not seem to quote you
Nice job, Chris. The comments on the WaPo site can indeed be depressing, but it's not completely one-sided: I and some others have done our best in your defense. It's not easy being green.
I only wish it hadn't taken the Post over a month to do this. Very disappointing, for what was once a great paper.