Nature: Scientists Urged to Plan for the Next US President

A pause during a busy day at Duke to post this fantastic piece from Nature:

i-69b241f7d169677d661f16b87cf46e0c-451875a-i1.jpgQuit whining and get proactive. That's the message that policy experts gave scientists at the weekend [AAA conference]. They advised them to stop complaining that politicians don't take science seriously and instead prepare for the presidential changeover next January.

Scientists were urged to organize now -- for instance, by coming up with a list of names for high-profile science positions in the new administration, no matter who runs it.

Later the article discusses Saturday's Boston debate and ScienceDebate2008:

Both advisers said their candidates were considering participating in the science debate, planned for 18 April at the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Invitations have also gone to John McCain and Mike Huckabee.The pair, together with Ron Paul, were all invited to the AAAS meeting, although none sent a representative.

Outgoing AAAS president David Baltimore says he sees little difference between the Democratic candidates, and knows little about where McCain stands on science issues. But no matter who wins, he says, "we'll be light years ahead of where we are".

Nature's Editor-In-Chief Phillip Campbell, along with U.S. Executive Editor Linda Miller, and Editor Jamie Wilson are luminary endorsers of ScienceDebat2008. Read the full story here.

More like this

The invitations have been sent, the date and venue scheduled, and already the blogosphere and beyond are ablaze! Hot off the Greenwire, Lauren Morello, reported: A group of scientists, journalists and lawmakers pressing for a presidential science debate said today it is planning to hold the event…
Chris and Sheril have been working tirelessly to make a Presidential Science Debate happen, and there's been real progress: ScienceDebate2008 is now co-sponsored by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the National Academies, and the Council on Competitiveness. We were looking…
Saturday I reported that AAAS had pulled together an unexpected preliminary presidential science debate at the annual meeting. The event was organized by the Association of American Universities and the National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges and as promised, here's what…
Our efforts were recently mentioned in an editorial in Nature: Election year offers a chance for scientists who aspire to a direct role in the political process to make their voices heard. Prompted by seven years of what they see as manipulation of scientific findings by the Bush administration,…

You know, I was just saying to a friend of mine the same sort of thing. I was handing out those buttons at AAAS, and I am glad to have participated. But I'm actually almost ashamed that the steering committee/organizers of this are largely not practicing scientists. We should have been leading this. I think we do need to shake more trees.

I'm so glad to have these great allies, of course. I just feel like we should have been doing this all along.

(And I have a handfull of buttons left if anyone wants one...)