On Michael Steele's 'Cooling Process'

Several readers have emailed me to comment on Michael Steele's ummmm...imaginative explanations of both global 'cooling' and Greenland:

"We are cooling. We are not warming. The warming you see out there, the supposed warming, and I am using my finger quotation marks here, is part of the cooling process. Greenland, which is now covered in ice, it was once called Greenland for a reason, right? Iceland, which is now green. Oh I love this. Like we know what this planet is all about. How long have we been here? How long? No very long."

You want me to respond to that gibberish? Seriously? The man got the history of Greenland wrong... need I really wax poetic on the rest? It's not a question of 'what this planet is all about', but rather what planet is the RNC Chairman on?

My take is that I'm embarrassed for the Republicans. No, I may not always agree with their policies, but in terms of who is representing their image right now, surely they can do so much better...

More like this

The sun heats the earth, but unevenly. The excess heat around the equator moves towards the poles, via a number of different mechanisms, the most noticeable for us humans being via air masses. That's what much of our weather is about. Heat also moves towards the poles, in the ongoing evening-out…
This is a guest post by David Kirtley. David originally posted this as a Google Doc, and I'm reproducing his work here with his permission. Just the other day I was speaking to a climate change skeptic who made mention of an old Time or Newsweek (he was not sure) article that talked about fears…
Every once in a while Chris Matthews does a good deed. On last night's edition of Hardball he had conservative radio talk show host Kevin James on his show. James was keen to pontificate on the nature of appeasement. Matthews' other guest was Mark Green. What happened next was priceless:…
The Australian continues to display its contempt for science, scientists and the scientific method. They've published this piece of AGW denial by David Evans. Last time I looked at Evans he was saying that new evidence since 1999 had changed his mind about global warming, with this new evidence…

This reads more like SNL than news. Embarrassing and sad.

in terms of who is representing their image right now, surely they can do so much better.

Unfortunately, no. In fact, Mr. Steele is almost certainly too close to reality for the Party leadership. His remaining time as chairman is short.

By D. C. Sessions (not verified) on 20 Mar 2009 #permalink

How do these people walk around the halls of power and never run into anyone who's informed? Not all the GOP is completely clueless (climate change at least gets recognition as a problem on David Frum's blog). Don't any of these people with a clue talk to George Will? Or Mary Matlin?

By Jon Winsor (not verified) on 20 Mar 2009 #permalink

Just when you thought the Republican War on Science was over....

Not all the GOP is completely clueless (climate change at least gets recognition as a problem on David Frum's blog).

That wasn't very wise. No telling how long he can get away with it.

Don't any of these people with a clue talk to George Will? Or Mary Matlin?

Besides the whole persona non grata thing, there's the simple matter of prudence: these people have power in the Party, and the less power the Party has the less outlet they have outside of it.

By D. C. Sessions (not verified) on 20 Mar 2009 #permalink

Sadly, the reality is that the Republicans CANNOT do so much better.
They are in a total disarray, at a huge deficit, and this is it..

There's some consolation in this. With each passing year, the evidence in favor of AGW just keeps piling up higher and higher, and it's starting to show in ways that people can relate to. The recent fires in Australia cannot be definitively attributed to AGW, but as we get more and more stories of forest fires (and the process has already begin in the American West), and stories of problems with the Alaska pipeline because of thawing permafrost, and so forth, I think that more and more people will conclude that the AGW deniers are totally out of touch with reality.

By Erasmussimo (not verified) on 20 Mar 2009 #permalink

Frum likes David Cameron, Rush Limbaugh not so much (he had a Newsweek cover story on the subject recently). Looks like he's trying to do some sort of insurrection. Chris, if you're looking for Republican allies, a number of his blog posters seem science friendly.

By Jon Winsor (not verified) on 20 Mar 2009 #permalink

Sorry, a bit melodramatic, but yes, science friendly Republicans. They do exist.

By Jon Winsor (not verified) on 20 Mar 2009 #permalink

What you're saying is that Michael Steele has been suckered by an 1100 year old real estate scam? If so, does the RNC have a real estate division -- I've got some land for sale. It's a new housing development in Florida called "Aqua Terra."

Sorry, a bit melodramatic, but yes, science friendly Republicans. They do exist.
Wow! That's fascinating! At what zoo can I go see them?

Sorry, cheap shot.

By Erasmussimo (not verified) on 22 Mar 2009 #permalink