The Creeping Death of Science Journalism

i-30d16306493c90fbbcb0ac11a431ed99-journalism_591.jpg

My latest Science Progress column is about the recent killing of science coverage at CNN, and the broader media business context in which this is happening.

The upshot: If we want science journalism, especially in these awful economic times, we have to fight for it and be willing to spend to support it.

You can read the full column here.

More like this

My Science Progress column is now up: I try to set the George Will scandal in the broader context of what's happening in the media: We often hear that "technology" is what's killing newspapers--innovations like Craig's List have destroyed the in-print classified advertising market; people have…
CJR has the latest, from the Woodrow Wilson Center. Now Peter Dykstra, long at CNN, is writing for an environmental website; and now Seth Borenstein, long at AP, acknowledges that we're in a science journalism crisis (he was at time past a skeptic of this notion). Meanwhile I sometimes worry that…
My latest Science Progress column just went up...it's about the decline of science reporting in newspapers, and what we can do to fight back against this trend. I start out with the story of Peter Calamai, until recently the staff science writer of the Toronto Star: Peter Calamai describes himself…
Some guy named Mulshine, who is apparently an ancient journalist (remember: generation is mindset, not age), penned one of those idiotic pieces for Wall Street Journal, willingly exposing his out-datedness and blindness to the world - read it yourself and chuckle: All I Wanted for Christmas Was a…

Not to worry. We'll always have Denyse O'Leary.

You welcomed suggestions -- can you talk a little about your experience working as a freelance science writer? Science writing (and reporting in general) is in crisis, but that seemingly could be a boon to freelancers (assuming enough publications stay in business). Or is the nature of science journalism inherently a poor fit with the nature of freelance work? Be curious to hear your thoughts.

Kit,
As a freelancer, unattached, I keep my options open and try to do as many different kinds of work as I can, ranging from books to articles to blogs. With the freedom inevitably comes more risk, but I've always found it worth it. The trends in the industry worry me, but I also feel as though more and more people in this field are going to end up doing it my way....

Charlie Rose had E. O. Wilson, Paul Nurse and Michael Novacek on last night. The subject, in general, was biodiversity. Wilson, at some point, told Rose that we need to continue educating our politicians as well as the public on the need for habitat preservation.. since without that you don't have species preservation.

If the ability to reach everyone through journalism goes away, we are left with the public schools as one of only two options remaining and that takes a generation to succeed.

Since the internet is the other option, we have to make sure that we do not become so Balkanized that we only talk to each other.

Wes,
What do you mean by succeed? And exactly how will one generation of public education accomplish this? Why will the education of the next generation be any different from the previous generation?

With regard to the internet. I suspect that we already are only just talking to each other.

But, to take Wilson's point one step further, I take comfort in the fact that we humans are behaving quite predictably in acquiring energy subsidies, and demonstrate no particular superiority to any other organism in dealing with its consequences, putting us squarely in the natural realm of all other living creatures. That, somehow, is reassuring. We preserve habitat when it is convenient, we destroy when it becomes necessary. Viewed from the perspective of the long span of human history and prehistory, we are acting out, predictably, a relentless and irreversible set of biological and cultural equations of which the participants are barely aware of, if at all.

By Eric the Leaf (not verified) on 09 Dec 2008 #permalink

In Los Angeles, former LA Times reporter Kevin Roderick addressed the collapsing state of the Times and local reporting in a radio commentary that might be of interest here:

"Anyone in L.A. who thinks thriving, independent fearless news reporting is important has to be feeling pretty grim this week. While attention has been focused on the financial troubles at the Museum of Contemporary Art, another Southern California institution at risk of collapse would leave an even larger hole in the region.

That institution is the local news media.

With the advertising model broken, the journalism practiced here by newspapers, radio and TV is getting weaker. And it was never that strong to begin with.

I was talking about this the other night with a local political figure who admitted that politicians he knows no longer fear the LA media. You could add the lobbyists, power brokers and other shadowy players who quietly wield a lot of influence over what happens in Los Angeles.

They know that with some exceptions, the reporters who are left don't have the time, the protection from their bosses or -- too often -- the skills to dig for hard stories.

I had this conversation at the Los Angeles Magazine holiday party, held on the terrace at the new Grammy Museum overlooking downtown.
Authors, editors and some of the powerful we're supposed to be keeping honest were commiserating about layoffs at National Public Radio, Sam Zell and the waning condition of L.A. journalism.

This week's bankruptcy filing by Tribune, owner of the L.A. Times and Channel 5, is a warning that we could be close to losing key pieces of local news coverage. Tribune's problems are not all due to Sam Zell's ill-conceived ownership, but it doesn't help that he's over his head in the media business.

That, combined with his almost total unconcern for quality journalism or for Southern California, makes Zell the most undesirable kind of media mogul.

The Times, while still profitable, has been laying off journalists by the hundreds, killing sections and shifting to an online model that values quick hits and page views over depth.

The situation is worse in the smaller newsrooms that struggle to report on their communities, but are spread too thin and worry about their own extinction.

It's enough to make a guy wonder what it will take for the most public spirited minds in Los Angeles to stop complaining and do something about it. What if instead of bailing out MOCA -- or better yet, in addition to saving the museum - Eli Broad invested in creating the next generation of LA news media.

Not to single out Broad, though he did show a strong interest once in buying the Times. It could be any philanthropist who sees the value of smart, independent reporting unhindered by ideology, corporate influence or the need to pander to Technorati with snarky attacks, celebrity gossip and cute pictures of puppies.

LA is starting to spawn an online reporting culture that could fill the depth gap, but has a long way to go.

The time is ripe for participation of the moneyed class, who are generous when it comes to public television and causes like after school programs, preserving neon signs or building art museums.

There's a critical mass in LA of out-of-work journalists and others who yearn to create the next big thing. We have models to improve on, like the community supported Voice of San Diego and ProPublica, the nonprofit investigative newsroom that has grabbed some of the LA Times' best reporters.

It requires buy-in from those who complain Sam Zell is bad for Los Angeles. And acceptance that good journalism can afflict the comfortable. The return would be worth it."

For KCRW, this has been Kevin Roderick with LA Observed.

By Kit Stolz (not verified) on 12 Dec 2008 #permalink