Stem cell debate casualty in western North Carolina

When former Redskins quarterback Heath Shuler managed to bump off incumbent congressman Charles Taylor in November, there was much rejoicing here in western North Carolina. Many Democrats kept their hopes modest, however, as Shuler got elected campaigning on "mountain values," a not so subtle code phrase for the Christian fundamentalism that pervades the Blue Ridge Mountains. We didn't have to wait long for those fears to be realized.

Yesterday, Shuler voted against a bill to lift the ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. Fifteen other Democrats did the same. Why?

"I want to do it without destroying an embryo. We are continuing to see exceptional advancements in stem cell research that does not endanger human embryos, especially from amniotic fluid and umbilical cord blood," Shuler said. (Asheville Citizen-Times, Jan. 12)

Great. One study hints at some degree of promise turning back the molecular clock on a few cells, and Shuler's already touting the tired and discredited notion that there are better alternatives to embryonic stem cells.

Tags
Categories

More like this

As research into stem cells broadens, it seems like we're finding them in more and more places. Most recently, stem cells have been isolated from amniotic fluid. Interestingly, they possess qualities which pose as a kind of intermediary between adult and embryonic stem cells. As much as I hate…
One of the primary goals of Congress since the Democrats' stunning November 2006 election victory has been restoring federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. President Bush first imposed the restrictions on embryonic stem cell research in August 2001. After the House voted in May 2005 to…
The other day I picked up the September issue of Running Times and noted an item concerning the ACLI Capital Challenge. The Capital Challenge is a three mile road race open to teams representing the three branches of the federal government and the media. The proceeds benefit the District of…
In the days before the House vote to fund embryonic stem cell research, the Washington Post and Los Angeles Times ran page one stories heralding a Nature Biotech study that indicated stem cells extracted from amniotic fluid might have "near pluripotent" like properties. Yet, despite the heavy…

Yet they permit the creation of extra embryos for implantation. If they're not used for research, they're going to be dumped down a drain.

By Caledonian (not verified) on 12 Jan 2007 #permalink

Well said.

It's great to keep finding such excellent blogging talent in WNC. Have you checked out BlogAsheville? I would love to see you on the blogroll over there.

The WNC bloggers will soon gather again, this time in downtown Asheville, to swap stories and expand the network. Fire me an email, and I'll get you on the blogroll and let you know what's up with getting together.

scrutinyhooligans > yahoo () com

It's even sadder when he quotes a study where the (lead) author himself states that this method is not superior (and is inferior to, IIRC) embryonic stem cells. Someone I read over the last few days had a direct qoute from the author where he says that he wants research on embryonic stem cells, anticipating the anti-science crowds reaction.

Every time a research study discovers a novel method of harvesting a new type of stem cell someone wants to close the door on embryonic stem cells.

Instead, we should continue to research ALL types, embryonic stem cells and others. We cannot close the door on any one type.

Science moves along by allowing certain hypotheses and theories to die through comprehensive and detailed research.

We have not even began to scratch the surface on embryonic stem cells.