Woohoo! I've been published!

Yesterday I wrote about an absolutely horrible opinion piece that appeared in the Rutgers newspaper The Daily Targum, the author suggesting that those he deemed stupid deserved to die. Although I gave a detailed response on this blog, I wanted to address the Rutgers community as a whole and I shot off an editorial reply to the paper. I didn't hear back from the Targum editors so I wasn't sure whether my piece would run or not (especially since I was critical of the editorial board for not checking Pironciak's piece), but lo and behold, it's been published. There's little in my response that I did not say before, but I'm definitely proud to have my response taken seriously and I hope that it proves to be enlightening (although I know I can't compete with the crossword).

A note about the article; As regular readers of this blog know I have a style that incorporates long sentences and so some of my prose was cut up to fit the journalistic taste of the editors. This is especially apparent in the last paragraph, so if I seems like I'm speaking in fragments it's because some of the periods in the published piece should really be commas. Oh well, at least it made it to print!

More like this

Usually my Around the Web posts are full of pink fluffy bunny ain't-the-Internet-grand kind of links. Oh, sure, I do link to the occasional train wreck but that's rare. I really prefer that strategy because I tend to be an optiministic (if slightly cautious) person by nature. But everyone loves…
Here are a few pertinent quotes, but read the entire articles as well as long comment threads. Ed Cone: Skube published an opinion piece about blogs that, with the help of his editors at the LA Times, failed to uphold the journalistic standards he preaches. It's not the first time that Skube has…
I received an email from reader Doug Blank (who gave me permission to share it here and to identify him by name) about a perplexing situation: Janet, I thought I'd solicit your advice. Recently, I found an instance of parts of my thesis appearing in a journal article, and of the paper being…
To start off the sophomore year of the SCQ, I published a piece that I had sitting around for the last year or two. Basically, it's a creative non-fiction piece that looks at the sorts of things one can fear in the sciences. It actually started off as a request by Maisonneuve for their "Good…

Nicely done.

(Copy editor's note: check out the different definitions of "callus" and "callous.")

Thanks for the compliments, everyone! I wonder if Pironciak will reply as well, but I think his position is essentially indefensible (a correction/retraction would be nice, though).

Chezjake; The editors of the Targum saw fit to alter some of my prose, hacking some of my longer sentences into two and changing the spelling of a few words. I used "callous" in my letter, but it was changed by the editors for print. I was not told that I was being published or contacted by the staff, so I had no way to correct any mistakes they created from my original draft. Good eye, though, and thanks for calling me on it.

Just this past weekend while passing through the toiletries section of the supermarket I noticed a packet labelled "Callous Removal Cream". I'm guessing it refuses to take off the band-aid slowly, it just rips it off and tells you to quit blubbering.