Before I knew very much at all about ancient marine reptiles, I had only encountered two names for the long-necked plesiosaurs (Plesiosaurus & Elasmosaurus) and had assumed that the incredibly long skeleton hanging from the 4th floor ceiling of the AMNH was a representative of the latter. I wasn't right, but I wasn't far off; it was a skeleton of Thalassomedon haningtoni, and elasmosaurid and close relative of Elasmosaurus.
While not scientifically accurate, today's photo reminded me of Will Cuppy's sketch of "The Plesiosaur" collected in How to Become Extinct (just remember that this is meant to be a humorous essay and not scientifically accurate);
There were no real Sea Serpents in the Mesozoic Era, but the Plesiosaurs were the next thing to it. The Plesiosaurs were reptiles who had gone back to the water because it seemed like a good idea at the time. As they knew little or nothing about swimming, they rowed themselves around in the water with their four paddles, instead of using their tails for propulsion like the brighter marine animals (1). This made them too slow to catch fish, so they kept adding vertebrae to their necks until their necks were longer than all the rest of their body. Then they would dart their heads at the fish from a distance of twenty-five or thirty feet (2). Thus the Plesiosaurs resembled the modern Sea Serpent above the water-line, though they were almost a total loss farther down. They might have had a useful career as Sea Serpents, but they were before their time. There was nobody to scare except fish, and that was hardly worth while. Their heart was not in the work. As they were made so poorly, Plesiosaurs had very little fun. They had to go ashore to lay their eggs and that sort of thing (3). They also tried to get along with gizzards instead of stomachs, swallowing pebbles after each meal to grind their food. At least, pebbles have been found near fossil Plesiosaurs, and to a scientist that means the Plesiosaur had a gizzard (4). During the Cretaceous Period many of the inland seas dried up, leaving Plesiosaurs stranded without any fish (5). Just about that time Mother Nature scrapped the whole Age of Reptiles and call for a new deal. And you see what she got.
(1) Such as the Ichthyosaurs, who used their paddles for balancing and steering. The Plesiosaurs did everything wrong.
(2) They got the fish, but it would have been much simpler to learn the Australian crawl.
(3) The Ichthyosaurs stayed right in the water and gave birth to living young. It can be done if you know how.
(4) This is Gimmick's Law.
(5) Here we see the working of another Law of Nature: No water, no fish.
- Log in to post comments
The AMNH specimen is a cast of the holotype, which is in the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. It's a great specimen.
Incidentally, the reference to "How to become extinct" is wrong in a number of details. Although plesiosaur necks were very long, they were also rather stiff and not capable of the swan-like posture seen in many artists reconstructions and even museum mounts. Mobility was limited to movement at the base of the neck and a more flexible section in the last 18 or so vertebrae of the neck.
Some very interesting experiments have been done using a four-flippered robot which showed that although this form of locomotion is not especially efficient for cruising, it gives much more rapid acceleration from a standing start. This would be very useful in an ambush predator. I envisage plesiosaurs as drifting slowly through rather murky water, and insinuating their heads into shoals of fish or cephalopods - perhaps aided by cryptic coloration. The bulk of the body would be out of sight in the murk, so there would be little advance warning of the attack.
The discovery of embryos in Keichosaurus, which though not a plesiosaur is a close relative suggests that they gave birth to live young, and it seems highly unlikely that they could have dragged themselves onto land in any case.
By the way, it's Thalassomedon **haningtoni**.
Thanks for the comment Richard. I guess the AMNH spelled the species name wrong as I copied the spelling from a photograph of the explanatory plate that goes with the fossil, so thank you for the correction.
Thank you for the information about what was wrong with Cuppy's sketch, too. I should have mentioned that it was not to be taken seriously as it's one of a collection of humorous essays, so I've amended that as well.
Thanks for the laughter. I'm ahead on my quota forthe day and I'm not half-way through your posts for the day. If oleaeuropea posted something today Bo'bs liable to find me on the floor in stiches when he comes up for lunch (that's dinner in Nfld). God bless you
Jeremi
If the ichthyosaurs were doing everything so much better, how come they went extinct so much more quickly than the plesiosaurs did, huh? :-P
Mr. Cuppy should better stay away from the shoreline, he had made some *Liopleurodons* (pliosaurs are plesiosaurs, too) very angry...:-)