Photo of the Day #329: Indian rhinoceros

i-49b07648c6a96c646738173e103a5b7a-indrhino1.jpg


An Indian rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis), photographed at the Philadelphia Zoo.


More like this

An Indian rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis), photographed at the Bronx zoo.
A white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) photographed last year at the Philadelphia Zoo.
An Amur leopard (Panthera pardus orientalis), photographed at the Philadelphia Zoo.
An Amur tiger (Panthera tigris altaica), photographed at the Philadelphia Zoo.

Genuine Indian Rhinoceros! Accept No Substitutes!

A marvelous animal, and one all students of Art History and/or Philosophy of Science should contemplate. "In the first place," so to speak, Ernst Gombricht used the FAMOUS RHINOCEROS PICTURE example in his "Art and Illusion": presenting Albrecht Durer's woodcut, then a 19th century illustration supposedly painted "from the life" but showing distinctly Dureresque features, and ("lastly") a photo -- a very different-looking photo -- of a rhinoceros. So all art historians know it as an example of how learned artistic "schemata" can override actual perception in the composition of supposedly naturalistic images.

Then Paul Feyerabend took over the example (with credit to Gombricht) in a note to his "Problems of Empiricism." So now all philosophers of science know it as an example of the theory-ladenness of observation.

But -- accept no substitutes! -- Durer's caption makes clear that his rhinoceros is from India. And the photo is of an African (I think White) rhinoceros: a very different animal. Durer's image, though not photographic, is in fact impressively accurate: look at a bunch of photos of Indian rhinoceroses and you'll see that even the most baroque-seeming bits of decoration on Durer's beast can be seen as a representation of genuine features shown by some if not all members of the species!

Rhinos are my favoite Perissodactyls.

By Allen Hazen (not verified) on 03 Sep 2008 #permalink