Book Review: Terminal Freeze

i-c32d4f533853b4d99375df7956e41576-terminal freeze.jpg

One of the unwritten rules of creating a good horror yarn is that the location your story takes place in has to be as frightening as your monster. The setting almost has to act an an extension of the bloodthirsty antagonist; a place that can more easily be seen as its lair than a place of human habitation. In Lincoln Child's latest novel Terminal Freeze that place is Fear Base, a rotting military facility shivering the the shadow of Fear Glacier, and it is stalked by something utterly horrifying.

Readers of The Relic, another horror novel penned by Child and his sometimes partner Douglas Preston, will feel right at home as they delve into Terminal Freeze. Fear Base is a dusty, dark, and labyrinthine place just as foreboding as the natural history museum in which Preston and Child's first hit novel was set. (Child's choice of setting also closely recalls that of John Carpenter's The Thing, based on the short story "Who Goes There?") A further similarity to the earlier work is that the story follows a diverse group of characters with a scientist, in this case paleoecologist Evan Marshall, as the hero.

The basic storyline is as follows; a group of scientists discover something frozen in the ice, a creature with two predatory, cat-like eyes. At first they think it is a Smilodon frozen in ice, but as more information comes to light they are less sure of their initial hypothesis. Such a momentous discovery soon grabs the attention of the people who underwrote the expedition, the Terra Prime documentary network, and soon the scientists are sidelined as the film crew turns the base into a media circus.

The plan is to thaw the creature in front of a live worldwide audience, but before that happens the creature disappears. The Terra Prime bosses try to finger who stole the creature, and their anxieties increase of their crew starts to turn up dead. Maybe that thing in the ice wasn't dead after all, and those who stay at the base have an awfully difficult time figuring out how to kill it.

All of this makes for a familiar, but satisfying, story. It is not the best creature-centered horror story ever written but it is far better than most of the similarly-themed pulp put out in any given year. Still, I couldn't help but feel that Terminal Freeze is an amalgamation of other stories. The setting is almost straight out of The Thing, the protagonists try a method of killing the creature that fans of The Thing From Another World will immediately recognize, the creature's demise is very similar to that of the antagonist of Peter Benchley's White Shark, and there are many, many similarities to Child's earlier collaborative work, The Relic.

The correspondence between The Relic and Terminal Freeze is anything but coincidence. The scientists in Child's new book even cite the "Callisto Effect", a sort of saltationism with a vengeance, that was the pet theory of Dr. Frock in The Relic and Reliquary. It states that when a species becomes too numerous or starts to lose evolutionary vigor a monstrous superpredator suddenly appears and kills until it can kill no more. The new beast in Terminal Freeze is such an animal, a mammal/reptile hybrid that appeared at just the right time to cause the extinction of other creatures, even though its existence is never fully explained. In this way Terminal Freeze is sort of a sequel to The Relic as it clearly occurred in the same fictional universe, and I have to wonder (and, admittedly, hope) whether more novels about "Callisto Effect" creatures are being planned.

There are a few drawbacks to Terminal Freeze, however. First is that the characters are a bit stereotyped. There is the obsessed film producer, the stuck up actress, the wise old Native American, our "everyman put into the wrong situation" hero, etc. Those who act immorally ultimately get what is coming to them and it seems that the monster is an agent of higher powers as much as an earthly threat. This is conventional monster movie stuff; monsters act as a final judgment for the immoral. There is also a helluva lot of scientific jargon, particularly involving sound. I cannot explain why without giving too much of the novel away, but the scientists use so much jargon so frequently that they resemble the stereotyped scientists of 1950's b-movies more than any academics I personally know.

In some parts of the novel it seems that Child wants to show off what he knows about a given subject and does so through his characters. In one part the paleoecologist has to perform an on-the-spot autopsy. He protests that he has not studied a cadaver since grad school and wouldn't know what to make of it, yet he delivers a point-by-point study of the obliterated body that would make any forensic professional proud. Child falls into this trap of showboating his own knowledge through his characters multiple times in the book, and it certainly makes it seem more like classic schlock than realistic horror.

If you are a fan of creature features with a free weekend and a few bucks to spend I would certainly recommend picking up Terminal Freeze. It is quick, fun, and wouldn't make a bad movie if done right. If you're are not particularly fond of monsters causing mayhem in an isolated Arctic base, though, you might want to give this one a pass. It's satisfying for fans but those looking for a superior book might want to check out The Relic instead.

More like this

Originally posted by Brian Switek On April 6, 2009, at 8:10 AM One of the unwritten rules of creating a good horror yarn is that the location your story takes place in has to be as frightening as your monster. The setting almost has to act an an extension of the bloodthirsty antagonist; a place…
There were a lot of books I had intended to read that I didn't get to this summer. Between work, a summer class, and my own writing projects, I didn't have the time to sit down and hastily devour books like I did last year or the year before. Many of the books on my list were technical volumes,…
Creature-features are fun to watch any time of the year, but they're an absolute must on Halloween. Although there are many excellent SF and horror films to choose from, this year I'm going to have to pick John Carpenter's The Thing. Based on the Don A. Stuart (AKA John W. Campbell, Jr.) story "…
The best thing about Frank Peretti's 2005 novel Monster was that it was over quickly. I was able to zip through the 419-page yarn in about five hours, although after about five minutes I felt I had wasted too much time on this anti-evolution screed. I was loaned the novel by a friend who thought I…

I'm a fan of the writing duo and I'm always up for a good monster novel full of jargon, so I'll certainly pick this up. I'd rather read jargon than supernaturalism, although the monster as moral enforcer is a played out device.

No Pendergast, though, I assume?

Sweet, can I borrow it? Is it really named Fear Base and Fear Glacier? Because that's awful.

Frasque; There is a tad bit of supernaturalism, but I'll let you see for yourself. Alas, no Pendergast in this one.

Melanie; Sure!

Sounds like a pretty typical example of what I call "the beachbum thriller:" a trashy action/thriller you read while sitting in your chair at the beach. Preston and Childs are okay at it, although others do it better.

Incidentally, I believe the museum in The Relic was intentionally and specifically based on the American Museum of Natural History, where Preston worked for several years. I once had the opportunity to visit the AMNH's back rooms, where all the fossils are stored and the preparation work is done. The description in The Relic is dead bang perfect.

By wolfwalker (not verified) on 06 Apr 2009 #permalink

I purchased this book hoping that it would hold up to the reviews. Sadly, it did not. I wanted to like this book. And I tried. But the prose was so lackluster and stiff that I had a hard time plodding through it. Don't get me wrong - it's a VERY easy book to read, but the obsolete vernacular -- "silently as a fox", "leathery complexion", and a myriad of other hackneyed expressions -- made me wonder if the author put any effort forward or was simply going through the motions to fulfill contractual obligations. The writing and characters were so stiff that I had to make a conscious effort to forget that I was reading - the true sign of a bad book. The story sounded like it had some bones to it but it basically panned out like "The Thing" meets "The Ghost and the Darkness". Not the best $ 25.00 I ever spent. I'd recommend waiting for the paperback if you're hard-up for a summer read.

By Ryan Kowalski (not verified) on 10 Apr 2009 #permalink

It was a bit disapointment.
Everything started good, the frozen monster was good, the abandoned military bas was good (I like that kind of stuff), the shooting team at the end of the world was good hook... But the characters sucked a big time. They were DUMB. The science team lacked that superior mind that put them at that place, the movie team leaders were so pathetic... That executive producer lady was fine at the beginning (there could be a romantic spin-off) but her character grew boring as the rest of the Hollywood'ers. The indian shaman was the cherry of the cake. Doing his rituals while the monster killer is sneaking around... too old-fashion style. Maybe more suitable for a Cthulu-age cheap movie than for a technothriller.
The book was lightwave and easy. I could read it again if I'm in a certain mood.
Overall rating: 7/10.