The Ancestor's Tale Reviewed

The New York Times is running my review of Richard Dawkins's new book The Ancestor's Tale this weekend.

I'm particularly grateful at times like these to have a blog, where I can add extra information and the occasional correction.

Towards the start of the review I mention a remarkable tree of 3,000 species. You can download a pdf here. It's files like these that the zoom function were made for.

Towards the end of the review, I say that jellyfish and humans share a common ancestor that lived perhaps a billion years ago. There's plenty of debate about early animal evolution, but a billion years is probably too old--700 million or 800 million would have been better. Maybe I was thinking about fungi instead of jellyfish.

When I have a little more time today, I'll blog about some of the things that I think Dawkins should have included in his book but didn't.

Tags

More like this

Here's the most important thing about The Ancestor's Tale that I couldn't fit in my review. I kept noticing how little Richard Dawkins mentioned the other celebrity evolutionary biologist of our time, Stephen Jay Gould. After all, Gould was a prominent character in many of Dawkins's previous books…
(The first of a two-part post) The eye has always had a special place in the study of evolution, and Darwin had a lot to do with that. He believed that natural selection could produce the complexity of nature, and to a nineteenth century naturalist, nothing seemed as complex as an eye, with its…
Probing the origins of humanity is actually a lot like being a dentist. The bones of our hominid ancestors tend to fall apart, leaving behind a smattering of shards. But teeth, made of enamel, can do a better job of withstanding the ravages of time. And teeth--particularly those of mammals--are not…
Some ideas one might think are pretty clear. The notion of an ancestor is one of them. But I am astounded how few people understand this simple idea in the context of evolution. Ergo... The basis for evolutionary thinking is the notion of an evolutionary tree, or a historical genealogy of…

I like the "circular tree of life" pdf.

Where is the brave PhD who is willing to fill in the "t=o hole" in the center of the diagram?

By Joseph Poliakon (not verified) on 16 Oct 2004 #permalink