A Retraction and a Deletion

In trying to navigate the new ethical territory of blogging, I've decided to delete part of one of my posts. The full explanation is below.

Last week the story about the Turkish "quadruped" family was in circulation. I pointed to an article in which a Turkish scientist made an accusation of unethical payments against English scientists and a television company. When one of the English scientists, Nicholas Humphrey, complained in the comments that I was spreading "empty gossip," I updated the post with a partial retraction, apologizing for not following up on the accusation. However, I rebuted the claim that I was passing on empty gossip, and I raised some additional questions about the ethics of the undertaking. Dr. Humphrey and I have been exchanging some email since then, from which I've gathered that some people--including some reporters--have misread what I wrote. They're under the impression that I reported ethical and financial hanky-panky going on. In fact, I was pointing out some ambiguities that raised my concern. When Dr. Humphrey provided me with information clarifying the situation, I immediately posted it. But that apparently has not prevented some people from carelessly misreading my post. I believe that serious ethical issues must be considered whenever scientists work closely with television productions. But I do not want to be involved in the spread of this sort of damaging misinformation, even passively. Given how things have devolved, it seems like tacking on additional explanations is not going to rectify the situation. So I've decided to delete my discussion of the topic. It's not a perfect solution, but it's the best I can think of.

Tags

More like this

I've been lazy over the holidays with my blogging, so I'll defer, once again, to Physics Of Sex blog: Part 2 of Pumped Up and Ready for Love: Sex and Fluid Physics And once the flow gets going, you may want to make sure that your toys are ethical.
I'll admit, I've never been a big fan of New Year's resolutions. It isn't that I don't like setting goals... but vowing to make a major lifestyle change with a time limit does seem to be asking for trouble. After all, there will always be a touch of chaos. With that in mind, I actually made a…
Since I've gone over a week without any blogging, I feel that I owe my readers an explanation. Basically, I've just been incredibly busy in the lab. I've had a lot of time on the NMR machines, and I've been trying to make the most of it. On top of that, and in addition to my other work around…
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of speaking via Skype with Dan Simons's graduate-level science writing class. We talked about the ins and outs of academic blogging, and the nature and ecosystem of science communication online, and the students asked some terrific questions. I had asked Dan to…

i think you made the right choice...people skim too quickly, and google is an enabler in this way.

btw, there are two new articles on the story out, and i comment on it here. if dr. humphrey is reading this, i am curious if his assertions regarding probabilities was taken out of context, i'm a bit confused about the last paragraph.

I agree. This was the best choice.

By David B. Benson (not verified) on 11 Mar 2006 #permalink

Leaving aside the ethical issues, I'm sorry you threw away the other criticisms as well, about the atavism conjecture and the simplified analogy with the FOXP2 genes.