The Reality of Iraq: Sen. Clinton Still Doesn't Get It

By now, you might have read this NY Times article about Senator Clinton's difficulties in dealing with her vote to go to war. While others have commented on her disturbing belief in executive authority--which gets awful close to the 'unitary executive' concept espoused by the Bush administration, a loyal reader pointed out a very interesting part of the article that I had overlooked:

Mrs. Clinton's belief in executive power and authority is another factor weighing against an apology, advisers said. As a candidate, Mrs. Clinton likes to think and formulate ideas as if she were president -- her "responsibility gene," she has called it. In that vein, she believes that a president usually deserves the benefit of the doubt from Congress on matters of executive authority.

Senator Clinton "likes to think and formulate ideas as if she were president?" Well, I like to think and formulate ideas as if I were the Dear Pangalactic Leader, but that's not the reality in which we live either. Seriously, we're not talking about "a" president: the failures in Iraq are due to a specific president, George W. Bush. The only way his disastrous policies will be stopped is if Congress--that includes you, Senator--reigns in the president.

That Clinton does not comprehend this speaks to her competency.

What's more disturbing is the abdication of responsibility she advocates by granting the president of the benefit of the doubt. Let's see if I understand this: Congress can go to the mat over something not that important (e.g., a highway bill), but in the matter of declaring war--perhaps the most important decision Congress makes--they're supposed to grant the president the benefit of the doubt. That's really backwards.

More like this

In the wake of Clinton's victory in Pennsylvania, the NY Times editorialized that Hillary's campaign team had taken "the low road to victory." According to the Times, one particular ad (above) had put her campaign over the edge into Karl Rove territory: On the eve of this crucial primary, Mrs.…
I guess we should be glad that Senator Clinton has a plan to end the Republican War on Science. It needs to be done and she is right to do this, but it's sort of like getting excited that someone boldly supports the notion that 2 + 2 = 4. Clinton announced yesterday that: Hillary will restore the…
I had high hopes that a new Secretary of Labor would hit the ground running on Jan. 20.  I had visions of bright beams of light and positive energy radiating from the Department's Frances Perkins building, as an Obama crew under Labor Secretary Hilda Solis' leadership worked to restore DOL…
On Monday, I'm delighted to be attending a panel discussion in honor of the 2009 International Women's Day celebrations!  This global holiday celebrates the economic, political, and social achievements of women past, present, and future. Here in NYC, the World Policy Institute, the Women's…

One self-deluded egomaniac president per decade is one too many. We certainly don't need a second. God, I hope she doesn't win the Democratic nomination.

This is not a turning point for Clinton. It is a failure to turn point. To win, Clinton must change course, and state that she was wrong to vote in favor abandoning Congress's constitutional duty of deciding whether America should go to war.

There is no reason to believe the Iraq mess will not get worse between now and November 2008. The millstone of having once supported the Iraq war will prove to be much larger than it presently appears.

As with the Kerry joke, Clinton once again, in a complex move, finesses herself into an uncomfortable corner.

By michael Schmidt (not verified) on 21 Feb 2007 #permalink

Pardon me for being cynical but I see Senator Clinton's statement as just a way to get around voting for the war. Not that I blame her for that. Given the political situation at the time, there was really no way for a junior Senator to vote against it.

She's just being true to her own self.

Unfortunately that self is gutless, unprincipled, self-seeking, time-serving, triangulating, climbing crawling aging yuppie scum.

By Ktesibios (not verified) on 22 Feb 2007 #permalink