About Teachers Being 'Shovel Ready' Post....

...Apparently, economist Christine Romer thinks so too (italics mine):

...hundreds of thousands of public school teachers are likely to be laid off over the next few months. As many as one out of every 15 teachers could receive a pink slip this summer, the White House Council of Economic Advisers estimates. These layoffs would be spread throughout the country -- in urban, rural and suburban districts.

Such layoffs are terrible for teachers, for communities and, most important, for students. For the families directly affected, layoffs mean not only lost wages but often lost homes and postponed dreams. Because unemployed teachers have to cut back on spending, local businesses and overall economic activity suffer. And the costs of decreased learning time and support for students will be felt not just in the next year or two but will reduce our productivity for decades to come.

Additional federal aid targeted at preventing these layoffs can play a critical role in combating the crisis. Such aid would be very cost-effective. There are no hiring or setup costs. The teachers are there, eager to stay in their classrooms

.

But don't trust a professional economist, the Mad Biologist already told you this:

Regarding 'shovel ready', these jobs are very ready--and obviously the layoffs can be halted with the stroke of a pen. Or we could fire more people during a depression and hurt education.

(My version was more concise....)

What has been immensely frustrating about economic policy post-Big Shitpile (although it was pretty frustrating pre-Shitpile too) is that the appropriate actions, at least at the broad scale, were blindingly obvious. Yet an unholy alliance between the Uruk-hai wing of the Republican Party (which is most of the party) and 'fiscally conservative' Democrats scuttled or hobbled every initiative due to ideological inanity (believing that short term deficits are worse than massive, long-term unemployment).

It's not that I'm brilliant (Sweet Baby Intelligent Designer, I'm not), but this stuff really isn't hard. Unless, of course, you don't care about the highest level of unemployment in seventy years. Then coming up with reasons to not do something is kinda challenging....

More like this

One of the things that bothered me about the 'stimulus' bill (other than it not being called an employment bill) is that there was a focus on things being 'shovel ready.' Not only did this imply that the depression* would be short-term (whereas un-, underemployment, and flat wages are largely…
Bill Gross, the managing director of PIMCO and bond trader, sounds like Mike the Mad Chartalist (italics mine; boldface mine): While the current administration admits that the $25 billion in Recovery Act spending on infrastructure only created 150,000 jobs, it also stabilized and improved this…
Of course, some of us are already there. A long time reader has been saying ever since the first unveiling of the stimulus package that Larry Summers' poor advice was going to kill the Democrats--and be crappy policy. He's not the only frustrated one, as word is that Christine Romer, chairman of…
Actually, it will probably be several decades. While details of the budget ceiling negotations haven't been released, the initial reports sound pretty awful, with $2.4 trillion of cuts over ten years with $1 trillion in discretionary cuts (that's stuff like NIH and NSF, by the way). It's pretty…

Want to talk about evolution?

By Frank Abernathy (not verified) on 03 Jun 2010 #permalink

If you wonder why these "centrist" Democrats are such a problem, check out their connection to The Family.