The Texas Republican Party Has Gone Insane

The Texas GOP--from the same state party that gives Representative Joe "I'm sorry" Barton--has gone out of its mind. Someone over at Media Matters, who clearly needs to be given hazard pay, looked through the Texas Republican Party platform. While there is so much stupid in there, for me, this one takes the cake:

Further, we urge Congress to withhold Supreme Court jurisdiction in cases involving abortion, religious freedom, and the Bill of Rights.

Um, then what should the Court do? Argue over whether blacks get three-fifths of a vote? This is insane, and it's the only way people like Blanche Lincoln and Ben Nelson end up looking good not awful.

More like this

There are times I agree with this post by Ian Welsh: My biggest weakness this year in doing analysis has been hope. I have let hope that the Obama administration and a Democratic Congress will do the right thing, and that they aren't corrupt and incompetent, get in the way of clear thinking.…
Under the fold.... What Makes People Vote Republican?: Not everyone who votes Republican has been 'duped'. Conservative ideals appeal to some because they reflect heartfelt visions of a 'good society. The Religious Right's Religious Right: One of the fascinating things about the Palin story to me…
Annals of McCain - Palin, XLI: how I palled around with terrorists: No one who knows me would ever consider me a domestic terrorist. I am, in fact, a pacifist. You may think that's naive, but it would be a real stretch to consider my pacifism to be the same as terrorism, even if you think it helps…
...at least by the Blue Dog Democrats. Digby, in discussing the history of the demobilization of the Democratic rank-and-file, observes (boldface mine; italics original): Clinton was pretty good at speaking in several layers of code, but he had terrible problems in 1994, even though he delivered…

It is insane to most people, but these clowns seem to have an in-state base to whom stuff like this is just hunky-dory.

"Gone" implies that they weren't at some point. I admit I'm young, but I don't remember them being anything else.

Amusing. Typically (AFAIK, IANAL) if the Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction in a particular area, then the entire federal court system doesn't either. Sounds like a good-ol' States Rights issue. We don't want the feds looking over our shoulder and telling us what's constitutional and what isn't. Texans know how to decide that for themselves.

I was going to make a comment about the ignorance of someone thinking Congress could just pass a law to limit the Supreme Court's jurisdiction. But then I decided to review the US Constitution, and found this:

In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

Does that mean that it is within Congress's power to legislate exceptions to SCOTUS's jurisdiction? Frankly, that would be extremely scary!

I think it would be funny for Congress to pass a law restricting the Supreme Court and then having the Supreme Court overturn the law for its "breathtaking level of inanity." Even Roberts would have fun writing that decision.

The whole Texas Republican Platform makes me miss Molly Ivins more than ever.

Is Texas a real place? It seems like an imaginary place, like Bizarro world.

By NewEnglandBob (not verified) on 24 Jun 2010 #permalink

Brawndo's Got What Texans Crave! It's Got Electrolytes!

By Kate from Iowa (not verified) on 24 Jun 2010 #permalink

That's what happens when the sane people leave a party. Only the crazies are left. It seems like each state's GOP are trying to outcrazy each other. The problem, of course is that a good portion of the country is either just as insane, or are one-issue idiots who will vote for the GOP because of abortion, gays, guns, etc.

@qetzal

I think congress has control of the breadth federal court system. But the supreme court is an appellate court so that there must be a lower court; fed and state courts.

That said, I may be mistaken and welcome any corrections

@qetzal

It's been a while since my Con Law classes, but I think the key to the stupidity is the first sentence of the second paragraph, "In all Cases...in which a State shall be a party, the Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction." That power of Congress (AFAIK) only extends to the cases where SCOTUS would have appellate jurisdiction. Most of the cases the Texas GOP seem to want Congress to withhold would probably fall under original jurisdiction, rendering their wants unconstitutional.

Great. I was going to try to get some work done. Now I'm going to have to look up case law.