When Hippies Punch Back

I'm a little late to this, but Susie Madrak asked Obama advisor David Axelrod a very important question:

Madrak asked, "I'm a blogger, and I don't know if you know this term, but are you familiar with the term hippie-punching?"

There was about a 15-second pause. "Go ahead," said Axelrod.

She continued. "Liberals and bloggers feel like we're the girl you take under the bleachers but won't be seen with in the light of day." She mentioned a series of incidents where the White House distances themselves from their base, and wondered how that helps Democrats regain enthusiasm from those same people. "We're not big numbers, but we raise money and we encourage people to vote and get involved. You have to help us help you," she concluded.

Greg Sargent provides some important context:

The call seemed to perfectly capture the tense dynamic that exists between the White House and the online and organized left: Though White House advisers in the past have dumped on the left, anonymously and even on the record, Axelrod repeatedly pleaded with the bloggers on the call for help in pumping up the flagging enthusiasm of rank and file Dems....

But hovering over the call was the obvious disconnect between this plea for help and statements like those of Robert Gibbs, who recently pilloried the "professional left" for being overly critical of the White House.

While I don't agree with Madrak on everything, I hope her question gets the phrase 'hippie punching' out there. Because it's a sardonic phrase, it might just reverberate with our infantile press corps. It would be wonderful if the political press corps started asking Obama what he's going to do to placate his own party instead of the Tea Party (one can dream anyway...). As a member of the 'amateur left', I appreciate this impulse, and, as Madrak explains, this will help get things done:

I wasn't whining about my feelings, for heaven's sake. I mean, who cares? It would take a remarkable lack of self-awareness (the kind Republicans have) to think that Axelrod wanted or needed to hear about my feelings. I was talking about the Netroots, laying it on the line: If I take you at your word, that you need netroots support, you need to stop treating us like the girl you're embarrassed to have your friends see you with. Help us help you by knocking off the condescending digs. (And that wasn't even touching the many policy differences we have.)

Like Madrak, I don't care if my feelings are hurt--I don't look to political operatives for self-validation. But hippie punching simultaneously insults your rank-and-file while shifting the goalposts rightward. That's not good for Democrats.

Stop the hippie punching, and instead, start smacking conservatives.

More like this

The Republican line is this: Bring back coal, shut down development, subsidies, any encouragement at all, for solar and wind energy. There is absolutely no logic to this policy, but it is in fact the policy. The reason for it is generally thought to be that the big rich corporations and…
Sir Charles says he's glad he didn't come to Netroots Nation this year. Reading about a panel on LGBT rights and immigration, he sees too many people claiming the President failed, rather than realism about the political system's current state: It seems pretty clear to me that Obama is moving…
Bloggers love it when other bloggers cite them to support their arguments. I'm no different, as even a blinking Plexiglass box of lights likes to have its arguments appreciated. I particularly love it when a skeptical blogger uses some small thing I've written to refute particularly egregious…
Susan Madrak is dead on target: if the rightwing is willing to give its wingnuts cushy jobs (also known as 'wingnut welfare'), why can't the left provide its own moonbat welfare for leftwing moonbats? As Madrak writes: Someone from either the Democratic party or some liberal organization showed…

Yeah, I'm not sure what they gain from "hippie punching" other than perhaps personal satisfaction. For a group of people who are otherwise pathologically politically savvy, it seems a very stupid tack.

On the other hand, to some degree there's an assumption they care. That if they felt it was politically viable that they would do something different than they're already doing. That may be a mistake - they could be handing us this milk-toast crap because they because they're wimpy and are afraid of the opposition, or they could be handing us this milk-toast crap because it's exactly what they want to do.

Unfortunately I see nothing to disprove the later.

There's something horribly irritating about the pablum-y language they use.

I have a certain hatred for people who mince words.

By Katharine (not verified) on 28 Sep 2010 #permalink