Paul Revere and Sarah Palin: Sending a Message Versus "Sending a Message"

By now, you might have heard that politicovangelist possible presidential candidate Sarah Palin has been burbling inanities about Paul Revere, including this doozy:

He [Revere] who warned the British that they weren't going to be taking away our arms, by ringing those bells, and making sure as he's riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be secure and we were going to be free.

She then doubled down on her idiocy. Amanda Marcotte puts this into context:

But I think it helps to understand that, for right-wing populists, this thing we call "history" is less about real people who did real things in the real world, and more like just the Bible Part II. It's a myth that can be manipulated to suit their purpose, which is usually to establish themselves as the only Real Americans. When Palin says she got it right, I believe she believes that, because her story wasn't really about Paul Revere. Her story was a thinly veiled allegory of the Tea Party worldview, and in it, Tea Partiers are Paul Revere and the British stand in for Obama, the foreign usurper who is out to take their guns.

I think the other thing that's going on here is the politics of machismo--often referred to as 'sending a message.'

Now, of course, Revere was sending a message: he was trying to mobilize the militia to prevent the regulars from seizing their artillery. But that's different than 'sending a message', which seems to constitute the primary impetus behind most of our foreign policy and much of our domestic policy. It's about "standin' up" (real Americans wouldn't dare pronounce the g in standing). This seems to be one of the primary goals of modern conservatism.

It's also stupid and counterproductive, but that's the Tea Party for you.

Categories

More like this

I'm not sure why colonial Americans thought they could succeed at blowing off the British to make their own country or countries, but that they needed to do something was obvious to a lot of people during the middle of the 18th century. In the end, it would turn out that the American Revolution…
Under the fold.... Alaska is right next to Russia: She was referring to the Diomede Islands which straddle the International Date Line in the Bering Straits. Big Diomede is on the Russian side of the line and Little Domede is on the Alaskan side. There is a village of about 150 Eskimos on Little…
Hmmm, I have not done one of these in a few weeks, so if you depend on me for your political information, check under the fold: The Terrorist Barack Hussein Obama: From the start, there have always been two separate but equal questions about race in this election. Is there still enough racism in…
Even John McCain's supporters don't care for his campaign's tactics of attacking Obama with lies. Meanwhile, Sarah Palin has referred to her own campaign and its supporters as "atrocious and unacceptable." She told the Christian Broadcasting Network: If I ever were to hear that [threats to…

"Now, of course, Revere was sending a message: he was trying to mobilize the militia to prevent the regulars from seizing their artillery"

Only indirectly--that was Gage's mission, but Revere thought he was going to arrest Adams and Hancock. It was only after Revere and Dawes got to Lexington that they realized that the redcoats were headed to Concord. But it wasn't unexpected--Gage had seized the powder stores in what is now Somerville and the colonists were nervous about that sort of thing happening again.

However, that doesn't excuse Ms. Palin making a hash of the story for contemporary political purposes.