How to cite a blog

A reader writes:

Dear Mo,

I want to quote your Brain in a Nutshell Essay. Can you please provide me some bibliographic data of this essay. I don't want to cite just Mo and a short-lived URL.

I was flattered to get this email, but I wasn't sure how to respond. I suggested something along these lines:

  • Costandi, M. (2007). The Brain in a Nutshell. Neurophilosophy Weblog. Retrieved on September 26, 2007, from http://scienceblogs.com/

    neurophilosophy/2007/08/the_brain_in_a_nutshell.php

As luck would have it, the second edition of Citing Medicine: The NLM Style Guide for Authors, Editors, and Publishers, which has just been published by the National Institutes of Health, includes a section on how to cite blogs, and provides some examples.  

Tags

More like this

A couple of years ago, a blog post of mine appeared in the List of References of a paper. Unfortunately, the form in which it was cited was this: #16 Zivkovic B. Clock tutorial #6: To entrain or not to entrain, that is the question. (2005); Available at: http://circadiana.blogspot.com. As you can…
Back at delightful Mocha's cafe on the corner... We just finished our session at the ASIS&T conference: Opening Science to All: Implications of Blogs and Wikis for Social and Scholarly Scientific Communication, organized by K.T. Vaughan, moderated by Phillip Edwards. Janet Stemwedel, Jean-…
Two recent events put in stark relief the differences between the old way of doing things and the new way of doing things. What am I talking about? The changing world of science publishing, of course. Let me introduce the two examples first, and make some of my comments at the end. Example 1.…
As ScienceBlogs prepares to receive its one millionth reader comment, ScienceBloggers are planning parties around the globe in celebration of the event. For our readers in London, Mo Costandi (Neurophilosophy), Ed Yong (Not Exactly Rocket Science), Selvakumar Ganesan (The Scientific Indian), Kara…

NLM? Don't you mean MLA?

Don't you mean MLA?

Unfortunately, NLM has released their own guidelines, as they're embarrassingly bad. No one should follow them if they have any hope of their citation containing useful information. The most egregious error is calling for only the blog URL to be cited, not the permalink, but they make other serious errors as well.

For example, there are different citation styles for "homepages", "parts of a website", blogs, and wikis, there's no mention of DOIs, and there's no way of handling the fact that some cited works on the web can change without changing their URL.

I don't think the person who developed the guidelines even knows what a blog is, as they categorize it under "Email and discussion forums" instead of in the Websites category.