What tennis rackets tell us about giant extinct armadillos

When sportsmen use rackets or bats, their best bet is to hit a ball on the "sweet spot", the point where various forces balance out to deliver powerful blows with only very small forces on the wielder's wrist. Engineers have the right tools and models to work out where this spot lies on their instruments. Now, palaeontologists have used the same techniques to study biological hammers that adorn the tails of giant prehistoric armadillos called glyptodonts.

At first glance, glyptodonts have little in common with the likes of Andy Murray and Roger Federer. These armoured beasts lived in the Americas several million years ago and the largest of them weighed up to two tons. Much like their modern armadillo relatives, they were clad in large suits of bony armour. Their long tails were similarly protected by bony rings and in some species, they were topped with large clubs, or spiky weapons that resembled medieval morning stars.

Uruguayan scientist Rudemar Ernesto Blanco was set about studying the tail clubs of the most formidable of the glyptodonts, by using the same approaches used to analyse sports tools. The analogy is particularly appropriate for species like Doedicurus, where the rings at the end of the tail were completely fused, meaning that the animal's rear end was defended by a single metre-long piece of solid bone - a biological hammer, indeed.

When wielding this weapon, whether against a predator or a fellow glyptodont, it would be in the animal's interest to strike at the sweet spot of its own tail to reduce the forces acting on the part of the tail where the bony tip met the more flexible base. Otherwise, it might have risked severe strain and damage. To find the locations of these spots, Blanco applied sports modelling techniques to the tails of nine species of glyptodonts.

i-76ad4db076812959cc54305f429f8776-Glyptodont_batter.jpg

He found that the spots almost always sat near the largest of the many disc-shaped dimples found on glyptodont clubs. Scientists think that on the living animal, these depressions marked the locations of horny spikes and in fact, almost every drawing or painting of glyptodonts with spikes at these discs. The location of the largest spike over the tail's sweet spot would have allowed the animal to concentrate the force of its strike in a small area, maximising the damage it inflicted on others while minimising the stress to its own body.

These results support the idea that the clubs were used in combat, but Blanco suggests that they were more useful for duelling with rivals rather than warding off hunters. He views the club as a precision weapon, used to deliver blows near the sweet spot during highly ritualised fights, much like those that modern plant-eaters engage in. Hitting a fast mobile predator, like a sabre-tooth cat, would have been far trickier.

However, smaller glyptodonts may have used their tails in more varied ways. While larger species could really only swing them from side to side, the smaller ones had much more flexible tails able to move in a variety of directions. Perhaps predators were more likely to feel the smash of these smaller tails. 

Humans aside, glyptodonts are one of the few species to use a biological hammer to fight, kill or defend. The awe-inspiring mantis shrimp can break aquarium glass with a forearm that hits with the force of a rifle bullet. And as with the glyptodonts, the dinosaur group known as the ankylosaurs wielded bony tail clubs. The location of their sweet spots are next up for Blanco but another scientist - Victoria Arbour from the University of Alberta - is ahead of the game on ankylosaur clubs. 

i-59258ca4741512fb90eba6422c2848b9-Glyptodont-exhibit.jpg

Reference: Proc Roy Soc B 10.1098/rspb.2009.1144

Image: by Wilson Dias

More palaeontology: 

i-77217d2c5311c2be408065c3c076b83e-Twitter.jpg
i-3a7f588680ea1320f197adb2d285d99f-RSS.jpg

More like this

Welcome to day 2 of the 'ankylosaur week' series - for the background on this go see day 1 on Hungarosaurus. Before talking about today's ankylosaur, here's a quick 'everything you wanted to know about ankylosaurs but were afraid to ask'. Ankylosaurs were ornithischian dinosaurs from the Jurassic…
Well done and thanks to everyone who had a go at identifying the mystery skull, and congrats to TJ, Jorge Velez-Juarbe, Mark Lees and others: it was indeed a glyptodont, specifically a glyptodontine glyptodontid and, most specifically of all, Glyptodon clavipes. So much for posting the answer on…
If you read the previous article on stegosaurs you'll know that a collection of papers devoted to examination of this fascinating group appeared last year (2010) in a special issue of Swiss Journal of Geosciences (SJG from hereon). These papers resulted from a meeting held at the Sauriermuseum…
Another day, another ankylosaur. This time: Silvisaurus condrayi. Known only from the Albian-Cenomanian Dakota Formation of Kansas and described by Theodore H. Eaton in 1960, Silvisaurus is a surprisingly well known, though enigmatic, nodosaurid. Because Eaton provided a life restoration in his…

I didn't realize glyptodonts had fused caudal vertebrae leading up to the club. That's another similarity to ankylosaurs--the distal third (sometimes more) of many ankylosaur tails are fused into a solid pole.

I don't think it's correct to say that the mantis shrimp's forearm 'hits' with a force strong enough to break aquarium glass. Rather, it snaps it so fast that it creates a tiny, but powerful shockwave in the water - it's the water movement that does the breaking.

Very cool stuff. But... someone had to say it (sorry): glyptodonts are not armadillos, though they do seem to be member of the same major xenarthran clade (Cingulata).