Why women aren't funny....

i-6e6f88f29fcb673ae62eda32b18c4f85-Grumpy Old Women.jpgHmm... I know plenty of funny women.... so don't whine to me ;)

"What makes the female so much deadlier than the male? With assists from Fran Lebowitz, Nora Ephron, and a recent Stanford-medical-school study, the author investigates the reasons for the humor gap."

The article also goes on to say how men are more stupid than women...

And this...

If I am correct about this, which I am, then the explanation for the superior funniness of men is much the same as for the inferior funniness of women. Men have to pretend, to themselves as well as to women, that they are not the servants and supplicants. Women, cunning minxes that they are, have to affect not to be the potentates.

Uhhh ok?

This Vanity Fair article is actually pretty funny :)

ohhhh yeah - don't forget to go check out the new scienceblogs blog Neurontic!

More like this

Maybe it sounded good at the editorial meeting: Have Christopher Hitchens, supposedly funny, clearly chauvinistic, write about Why Women Aren't Funny. And so we gots, in a recent issue of Vanity Fair, Hitchens -- who seems ever more a boorish drunk rather than a quick-witted friend of the vine; an…
There was a great big New York Times article on women in science this week, which prompted no end of discussion. (I also highly recommend Bee's response at Backreaction.) It's built around the personal story of the author, Eileen Pollack, a physics major at Yale who decided not to go to grad school…
The Scientist wants you to vote for your favorite life science blogs. To get the party started, they asked seven prominent science bloggers to recommend their favorite science blogs. I mean, they asked seven prominent male science bloggers for their recommendations. This is science, after all,…
David Futrelle missed an opportunity! He posted about this awesomely stupid Reddit thread that asserts the biologically inferior nature of women, and then he admits to reading only a few of the comments in the resulting mess. I do love that statement that They have very little conceptual…

I just read the whole thing...I had to. Man knows how to be provoactive. He also knows how to patronize. He's got, like, a black belt in being patronizing. It's an interseting topic. I disagreed with most of what he had to say, except for this sentence here:

"Precisely because humor is a sign of intelligence (and many women believe..that they become threatening to men if they appear too bright), it could b e that in some way men do not *want* to be funny. They want them as an audience, not as rivals."

Sounds about right to me, at least for some men.

yeah I think I might agree with that as well... the article was pretty funny - just full of crap ;)