Manuscript note by Francis Crick: "I think the most significant aspect of DNA is the support it gives to evolution by natural selection." Note written on the back of a letter from D J E Stamp.
13 June 1989.
(hat tip to Branch of the NCSE)
- Log in to post comments
More like this
A couple months back, I had a piece published at The Walrus which kind of looked at brief encounters with famous people - you know, the type that I'm sure many of us had during the course of our academic careers.
One of the people listed was the time I bumped into Sir Francis Crick, and that it was…
Not all regions of the genome are equal in the eyes of evolution. For example, natural selection is more effective on genes in regions of higher recombination. We have known this for a while. The connection between recombination rate and natural selection was nicely refined when it was shown that…
What? You thought I was serious? I'm Mad, not crazy. But the release of Expelled gives me an opportunity to note one facet of creationist stupidity.
A while ago, in response to Michael Egnor, who features prominently in the movie Expelled, I discussed how creationists party like it's 1859. As…
Uh-oh. Evolution has just been refuted by a very sophisticated simulation. Try it; you'll quickly discover how frustratingly boring evolution can be, and you'll give up on it.
The 'simulation' is simple: put some random text in a box, click on a button, it randomly substitutes a random letter for…
I like this quote from Francis:
" I should perhaps emphasis this point, since it is good manners to pretend the opposite. I do not respect Christian beliefs. I think they are ridiculous."
Great find.
Love the sentiment. However, is it definitely real? Crick was an Englishman who worked in England, so why is the date written in the American format? Was he living in the US at the time maybe?
From 1977, Crick worked at the Salk Institute in California, long enough for him to have fallen into the American dating style.
Ah, that would explain it.
Interesting paper on Crick's hypothesis of
Directed Panspermia:
http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/SC/B/C/C/P/_/scbccp.pdf
Moran has his knickers in a twist about it, though, on the grounds that this is true only if you're talking about molecular phylogeny and he believes Crick wasn't thinking of that,and "therefore" it was a stupid comment and Crick was barmy by that time anyway. One of his commenters has set him straight, though, reminding us that Crick was a pioneer in predicting the usefulness of sequence data for phylogeny, though as he made his original proposal in the 50s he was taking about protein sequences back then (of course he was well aware of the use of DNA sequence comparisons in 1989!)
Speaking of the value of DNA, remember that Tostidos commercial you mentioned where the dad says to his kid we have different DNA so we can survive and adapt? I just saw it again today, and now when the kid asks why? there's a pause before the dad just says "so we can adapt." The DNA reference is absent and the empty pause is in its place.