Hmmm. Maybe I should cultivate some dreadlocks

i-f6518d993e4be580c2662d5f560c186c-runeolsenoctpus.jpg

I'm disappointed in Cory Doctorow. Look at the caption he put on this image:

I'm pretty taken with the sculptural work of Rune Olsen, which revels in a kind of twisting, arching form that lodges somewhere between titillating and disgusting.

I looked all over…so where's the 'disgusting'?

More like this

The Poincarė conjecture has been in the news lately, with an article in the Science Times today. So I've been getting lots of mail from people asking me to explain what the Poincarė conjecture is, and why it's a big deal lately? I'm definitely not the best person to ask; the reason for the recent…
While I was reading Cory Doctorow's Information Doesn't Want to Be Free: Laws for the Internet Age, I was reminded of a quote of his that I blogged about a few years ago: The people in Makers experience a world in which technology giveth and taketh away. They live through the fallacy of the record…
I actually read the freely downloadable version of Cory Doctorow's novel Makers on my Kobo ereader, even though I did buy the hardcover when it came out last year. Mostly, I wanted to check out the experience of reading a long text on my reader. Overall, the Kobo reading experience was terrific,…
I have a whole pile of science-y book reviews on two of my older blogs, here and here. Both of those blogs have now been largely superseded by or merged into this one. So I'm going to be slowly moving the relevant reviews over here. I'll mostly be doing the posts one or two per weekend and I'll…

Well, obviously, it's disgusting to tangle that beautiful octopus up with an icky vertebrate.

By Mike from Ottawa (not verified) on 07 Nov 2007 #permalink

The proximity of the octopus' beak to a set of male genitalia is cringe-inducing. Other than that, I'm at a loss.

If you're a fag into bestiality I guess it's not disgusting.

Ah I get it, the disgusting part comes from the comments section.

I guess it's disgusting because it looks as if they're doing weird fiddles.

I guess japanophiles would call this tentacle rape?

Wow...just from an artistic standpoint the lines and the motion are beautiful. You can actually see the subjects twisting and turning, and the duality of expression on the male human subject is mesmerizing. Of course, I lack male genitalia, so the proximity is not as cringe inducing to me. And, um, Dude may have stumbled upon the wrong blog to use those words.

That is not a male. Those are breasts, albeit small breasts, and the octopus is clearly giving this woman the ride of her life. Just look at that nipple-twisting action!

That's an amazing piece of art. Cringe inducing yes, but amazing none the less.

Maybe Dude's just having a bad day, he seems to have missed the point entirely.

I'm with Sabrina. It's an amazing piece. Incredibly fluid, definitely beautiful, and for sure disturbing on several levels -- and good art should disturb the viewer.

I am intrigued by the materials the artist works with. My immediate assumption based on the photo was fiberglas, but apparently his chosen medium is papier mache.

Her abdomen is protuberant. She is clearly pregnant. That is an Octopus practicing trans-species obstetrics.

"Yep, your water's broke alright."

er, um....dreadlocks are disgusting.

I agree, the sculpture is definitely derivative of The Dream of The Fisherman's Wife. I am bummed out that I missed being the first to make the connection on this thread by 35 minutes.

By David vun Kannon (not verified) on 07 Nov 2007 #permalink

Huh. I don't get disgusting out of this piece at all. I think it is fascinating. It is hard to read the expression on faces when they are upside down, so I flipped the image to see what the vertebrate's face looked like, and I am getting a 'pleasure' vibe . . . . Cool art. Glad you posted it, PZ.

By ctenotrish, FCD (not verified) on 07 Nov 2007 #permalink

By an odd coincidence, I was just reading this short story last night, about a sculptor of similar works.

I'm also reminded of a documentary about art history I saw some years ago, and they showed a work of Renaissance sculpture depicting the agonies of some martyred saint. The art historian pointed out that this revered work of art clearly shows a woman in the throes of orgasm. Anybody know what sculpture I'm talking about?

#17

The art historian pointed out that this revered work of art clearly shows a woman in the throes of orgasm. Anybody know what sculpture I'm talking about?

Bernini's Ecstasy of St. Theresa, perhaps?

Re: HP # 17
The Ecstasy of St. Theresa by Bernini

I like Rune Olsen's sculpture. The finish is interesting given the newspaper/acrylic medium he's using. Papier mache is harder to manipulate so skillfully than one might think.

Bernini's Ecstasy of St. Theresa - unforgettable, once seen.

#18, 19: Thanks!

/* totters off to do a Google image search */

I'll have to go tell Doug Winger that he can get into serious galleries if he just does all his art in Papier-mâché.

Where's the line between "neat art" and "would you like some therapy"? A couple of his sculptures are very striking, but seen en masse there seems to be some real creepiness going on.

Clearly, what's disgusting is that the put a vertical pupil, like some sort of vertebrate feline, on the octopus eye instead of its proper horizontal pupil. If one is going to truly espouse love for invertebrates, one must not project creepy vertebrate traits on them. Insisting that your octopus put on contacts before coming to bed is only one step away from having it wear a cheerleader outfit... it's just UNNATURAL. And it CREEPS ME OUT. I think we need a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT about this!

They're obviously doing something sexual, but I don't see it as disgusting at all.

After all, Aquaman had to come from somewhere.

Or how about this:

The next morning at the breakfast table, the guy's mother says "Bobby, are those sucker marks on your neck? Again??"

The floor of the gallery appears to be filthy. Other than that, the piece is quite beautiful.

I'll have to go tell Doug Winger that he can get into serious galleries if he just does all his art in Papier-mâché.

Coffee in sinuses. Fuck you!

Where's the line between "neat art" and "would you like some therapy"?

The two are not mutually incompatible. Maybe this is his therapy. Now you can go creep yourself out thinking about what he'd be doing if he weren't an artist. O_o

Oh, so that's what Zach de la Rocha is up to these days.

Its called "For Everything I Long to Do" so I guess its a sexual thing rather than some chap being eaten. And if you look at the rear shots his toes are positively CURLING in delight.
http://www.runeolsen.net/pages.php?content=gallery.php&navGallID=1&acti…

Looking at some of the other sculptures I think Rune is one very talented man, a sick little puppy no doubt but still very talented. Can't say I'll be putting any of them in my loungeroom any time soon though.

By Bride of Shrek (not verified) on 07 Nov 2007 #permalink

Zach de la Rocha exploded years ago. Onstage. Pretty awesome show, though.

Monty wins. ^_^

Bride of Shrek, that's not missionary position because both those bonobos are female. They're ...er... "making tortillas", for some languages. (Don't click that link unless you're at home!)

revered work of art clearly shows a woman in the throes of orgasm Hmm, I think someone should tell either Bernini or this art historian that what he thinks is the throes of orgasm is actually his date passed out from boredom. St. Theresa looks more like she's doing a sarariman going home on the Yamanote line at 2 am after a 12 hour workday followed by several too many mizuwari with the sempai. "ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ" is not full-throated orgasm.
(OK, I'm a philistine...slinks off)

Fuckedupeautiful O.o

I looked all over...so where's the 'disgusting'?

He kind of looks like he's getting a beak-enabled blowjob...

It's a striking piece of art, and not disturbing in the least. H.R. Giger's work, now that's disturbing.

Thanks Octopod, we WERE having burritos for dinner tonight but now I can't get the tortillas out of the pantry without wetting myself laughing. The things I have learnt from this thread are

a) what a Bonobo monkey looks like
b) that "making tortillas" is the funniest name for a sexual activity since the "Cleveland Steamer".
c) and, thanks to your enlightening link, that the group the Scissor Sisters was named after that particular "movement".

Who said scientists were boring!!!

By Bride of Shrek (not verified) on 07 Nov 2007 #permalink

GYAR! Bonobos aren't monkeys! They are apes!!!

/pant, pant

Sorry, pet peeve. :)

Nan -

I disagree.. Good art need not be disturbing. Good art needs to make you *feel* or "think*. If it doesn't do either, it's not good art.

(no, it doesn't count if the "art" makes you think "what a piece of crap" or "we spent our tax dollars on THAT?" )

As for this particular piece, it does appear to be - pretty clearly - modeled (pardon th' pun) on The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife. I find it well done, and.. well.. fascinating. Isn't it the epitome of a college date?