Demons

If you're partial to humor about demons (and all you atheists — you know you are), check out DEMONS, a webcomic, sort of. It's an interesting way to use YouTube, and I also rather like the mockery of Faithmole.

i-615d4a70f44aa85fcb0d53decdacb706-FaithMoleComic.jpg
Tags

More like this

Trade your soul for a DVD! All you have to do is post a video of yourself to youtube, stating that you deny the holy spirit, and you'll get a copy of The God Who Wasn't There. Why those magic words? Whoever blasphemes against the holy spirit can never be forgiven. Mark 3:29 More details on The…
It actually feels kind of good, considering that my job is secure, and that these critics are looking increasingly rabidly insane. I just sit back and watch their hysteria grow. Case in point: Rod Dreher, who seems to be crawling the walls and screaming right now. In his 'review' of the desecration…
The younger Free-Ride offspring would like to report on a recent field trip to the Math/Science Nucleus. Younger offspring: What's a nucleus anyway? Dr. Free-Ride: It's what's at the center of things. The cells in your body have nuclei, and so do the atoms that those cells are made of. Younger…
As is often noted, most modern recordings of Christmas songs range from utterly bland to excruciatingly awful. There are some that sorta-kinda work, though, and a bare few that are brilliant: In the interest of promoting, you know, music that doesn't suck, it's perhaps worth taking a look at what…

Hey, the bully looks like Darwin! Sure, he would've agreed that the universe is pitiless & indifferent, but he was a nice guy, by all accounts. So what's this Faithmole?

By Richard Harris (not verified) on 25 Oct 2008 #permalink

I don't get it.

By Porky Pine (not verified) on 25 Oct 2008 #permalink

..... I don't get it, either. What's up with the YouTube videos showing each cartoon for two seconds before manually switching them out? (And why so fast? I'm a fast reader and I still have to pause the video in order to read the text and at least glance at the artwork.)

The background music on the most recent "video" (didn't look at the others) was cute for about ten seconds, then it got old really fast.

whats a faithmole?

Religious or not, Faithmouse is at least clever and Dan Lacey is his own kind of brilliant. Not sure if I can say the same for the parody.

By Reed Miller (not verified) on 25 Oct 2008 #permalink

Wow, possibly a new high in stupid ways to use YouTube! They manage to present their comics at low resolution *and* annoy us by forcing us to watch them at their choice of speeds. Brilliant!

So, appropriating Mallard Fillmore, out to commit vehicular manslaughter on a hippie bus full of Doonesbury characters (drawn in the style of Trudeau before he could afford to hire assistants) is brilliant? The car sound effect, "Freep" is kinda subtle, I suppose.

As for Demons, it's all material handled much more thoroughly by S. Clay Wilson, with an R. Crumb rapidograph gloss. Happy to see it. I'm sorry to have learned that there are comics considered to be wholesome and family-oriented, that contain a fetus-angel named "Neverborn" kissing Obama while saying "He kills me!" Showing said character being strangled by a cross-hatched Darwin while a well-designed demon stands by may not be brilliant, but it'll do.

Don't call the demon well designed. It's well adapted, dammit.

By fleetmouse (not verified) on 25 Oct 2008 #permalink

There's nothing wrong with the denizens of a Cartooniverse being designed. It's the people who want to insist that the rest of us live in their own Cartooniverse that make me nervous, because sometimes their behavior seems better adapted to survival than mine.

It's appropriate that the sequence links (what do you call those things, anyhow?) at the top of the previous posting read:

« Well, yeah...so who does GW Bush endorse, anyway? ... Demons »

By Pierce R. Butler (not verified) on 25 Oct 2008 #permalink

And, if anyone is confused in the above link; Timothy A. Bear is Dan Lacey. That thread is the second part of a long descent into madness and away from Christianity.

By Reed Miller (not verified) on 25 Oct 2008 #permalink

Sorry, That was just ugly. And I don't really get the ACLU guy thing.

It was Richard Dawkins and not Charles Darwin who said the "pitiless and indifferent" schtick that is thrown back at Darwin by the believers. Darwin wondered why a god would allow a caterpillar to be eaten alive by a wasp larvae, and why a god would allow a ten year old girl to die, but he always seemed to be a pretty upbeat dude. Dawkins has had to put up with 150 years of irrational anti-Darwinists and just says it more forcefully and cogently.