Ms Magazine makes amends

Jen McCreight has published a solid response to the clueless anti-atheist article in Ms magazine…and it's in Ms magazine. It's good stuff, too, with a list of all the godless women the original article ought to have consulted.

More like this

The Ms magazine blog has an awful little article on the New Atheists that completely misses the point. It's about the sexes and atheism, of course, but it has little to say except to whine that the New Atheism is just like the old religion, and gosh, look at all those Old White Guys in the fore.…
Classic moment in ERV history: Me: *ranting to my mother about my interactions with a big-box-store veterinarian not understanding what 'platelets' are and letting smaller dogs attack him while he was waking up from anesthesia when he was getting neutered and my inability to get across to the 'vet…
... Twice. The story is here. Basically, the sign was first spay painted, the burned. Run of the mill anti-atheist vandalism. But, if you are not already tapped out from the Happy Holiday Season of Buying Stuff, you might want to go to this web page and make a small donation to WASH, who…
Jen McCreight is running an online poll to determine the most influential female atheist of the year. Uh-oh. You'd think she'd learn. But given that the results will be utterly meaningless, it's still useful — there's quite a long list of good XX godless folk, and commenters keep mentioning more…

I made an argument earlier that that a few people created disproportionate amounts of value for society. I cited the example of the Industrial Revolution as supporting evidence. About 95% of the rebuttals probably were nothing more than insults which referred to me as a libertarian turd.

Reading through the thread in question, I have to disagree with your description of events.

You start by asserting that the Industrial Revolution was an example of an elite being more productive that the general population.

This is immediately followed by several requests to back up that assertion.

This is followed by three posts where you first reassert that you're right, then respond to a different point, and finally complain about the tone of the thread.

Several more posts follow that directly question your central assertion (with arguments, not insults) and instead of responding, you complain about how mean everyone is.

Now, it's a long thread and I just scanned it quickly, so maybe I missed the part where you provided evidence for your assertions. If so, please provide a link to it.

As it is, the situation is as follows: you made an assertion, it was questioned, you refused to back it up. When people called you on that behaviour, you whined about it.