Some upcoming talks for those in Albuquerque or Ann Arbor (so many A's!):
- Feb 5, 5pm, University of New Mexico Center for Advanced Studies Seminars: The Symmetry Conjecture
- Feb 6, 4:00 pm, University of New Mexico Physics and Astronomy Colloquium: The Race to Build a Quantum Computer
- Feb 9, 4pm, University of Michigan Seminar: The Race to Build a Quantum Computer.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Self promotion for those around the University of Washington campus: I'm giving a talk in the physics department at UW. Mondays, October 20 at 4:00 P.M. Ronald Geballe Auditorium, Rm. A102 (cookies at 3:45):
Title: "Who Will Build a Quantum Computer: the Physicists or the Computer
Engineers?"…
there are many ways to rank a program: including its reputation, its performance, and more subtle quantitative indicators, some of which are contradictory and mutually inconsistent. Rankings are also generally lagging indicators and imperfect indicators of future performance, they are vulnerable to…
The Center for Inquiry has posted a list of its many Darwin Day events scheduled for locations across the country. For science enthusiasts, these events serve as an important ritual for building community and social identity.
Darwin Day events also provide a news peg for generating local media…
For those local to Seattle, I'm talking tomorrow in the Paul Allen center:
TIME: 1:30 -- 2:30 pm, Tuesday, Feb 24, 2009
PLACE: CSE 503
SPEAKER: Dave Bacon, University of Washington
TITLE: Symmetry in Quantum Algorithms
ABSTRACT:
Quantum computers can outperform their classical brethren at a…
Do you know any of the goobers at Chalmers racing to build a quantum computer?
"The Race to Build a Quantum Computer" --- would that be a Red Queen's Race?
Because after all, our evolving knowledge of quantum error correction (in terms of both fundamental mathematics and practical design) competes with our evolving understanding (in terms of both fundamental mathematics and experimental physics validation) of quantum decoherence mechanisms.
Hey ... that means this particular Red Queen's race is *fixed* ... it's set-up so that the mathematicians win either way! As usual! :)
More seriously, insofar as the experimental and theoretical physics is concerned, the most extensive historical discussion I know is is Obach and Stapleton's humility-inducing review of our evolving understanding of electron spin decoherence during the years 1936-72.
The lesson-learned is that, historically, Nature has been considerably more ingenious in creating quantum decoherence mechanisms, than physicists have been in foreseeing them.
------------
@incollection{Orbach:72,Author = {R. Orbach and H. J. Stapleton}, Booktitle = {Electron Paramagnetic Resonance},Editor = {S. Geschwind}, Pages = {121--216},Publisher = {Plenum Press}, Title = {Electron Spin-Lattice Relaxation}, Year = 1972}
5 pm? It's not at the usual 3:30 pm time?
Will you be posting slides from these talks ?