Where Quantum Computing Theory Is Done

Update 4/5/09: The wandering Australian does an analysis by institution.

Today, because I have way to many deadlines fast approaching, I needed to waste some time (procrastineerering), I decide to take a look at the last years worth of scited papers on the quant-ph section of scirate.com. The question I wanted to investigate is where quantum computing theory is occurring worldwide. So I took the top scited papers scoring over 10 scitations (42 papers in all) and looked at the affiliations of the authors: each co-author contributed a fractional score to their particular region (authors with multiple affiliations had their votes split.) And yes, I decided to lump all of Europe together and combined Japan and China (sorry). The results are as follows:

  • US: 40.07%
  • Europe: 30.68%
  • Canada: 18.75%
  • Singapore: 5.54%
  • China/Japan: 3.77%
  • Australia: 1.19%

Of course these results are subject to a plethora of problems: I mean the idea that one can extrapolate from a half rate voting website is silly! But that's what blogs are for, no? So let's plunge in :)

To me it was interesting to see that the U.S. is doing as well as it is, considering that fact that there have been considerably less hires of junior faculty in the U.S. in quantum computing that elsewhere. In looking at this it seems pretty clear to me at lot of this has to do with two institutions: Caltech (the IQI) and MIT. Another interesting fact for me was that Canada did not score as high as I would have expected, considering the vast resources that exist at the University of Waterloo and the Perimeter Institute. Finally it was quite impressive to look at the number of European contributions from the U.K.: far higher than I had appreciated.

So what conclusion should you draw from this? Probably none at all, considering the suspect methodology, but if you want something to write home about it's probably: the U.S. is behind the combined juggernaut of Canada and Europe :)


More like this

Some news for those interested in open-source publishing and "Open Science": Dave Bacon is announcing the debut of scirate.com, a sort of social-networking site for physics preprints: The idea came from the observation that while the arxiv is a amazing tool, one of the problems was that the volume…
Like the title says: Happy New Year! Looking back at the list of top scited papers on scirate.com, shows some good fun indeed: 23 SciTes - 0811.3171 Title: Quantum algorithm for solving linear systems of equations Authors: Aram W. Harrow, Avinatan Hassidim, Seth Lloyd 23 SciTes - 0809.3972 Title…
Back when I first mentioned the idea, people were kind of down on the idea of SciRate.com, Dave Bacon's project to make a collaborative filter for the arxiv.org prerprint server. Not one to be easily discouraged, Dave has continued to work on it, and it now features papers from all the different…
One interesting thing about quantum computing is that because it is a very new field, a large amount of the research in the field is on the arXiv (interestingly the worst users have historically been computer scientists.) Back in 2006 whenever I would sit around BSing about the arXiv with other…

And apparently you admitted as such in your last paragraph. Sorry. I've spent the day dealing with administrative crap including new state legislation requiring that we pay them lots of money to use some equipment we've been using for twenty years.

It is interesting that the US postdoc factory model works so well for producing good science.

Have you tried the analysis by institution?

Any bets on which institution tops the score? What about the top 3?