I Got Your Other Side Right Here

I'll have something more serious to say on this subject tomorrow (I want to sleep on it, and take another look at the post in the morning), but I have one quick comment on the New York Times review of Leonard Susskind's The Cosmic Landscape:


Susskind's insider perspective also lends an air of smugness to the whole affair. He falls prey to the common error of Whig history: interpreting past events as if they were inevitable stepping stones to the present. He allows remarkably little doubt about string theory considering that it has, as yet, not a whit of observational support. "As much as I would very much like to balance things by explaining the opposing side, I simply can't find that other side," he writes in his concluding chapter.

Now, granted, I haven't read the book, and this is just one quote pulled out of context for the purposes of a slightly snarky book review. But then, I'm having a hard time imagining a context you could put Susskind's quote into and not have it sound breathtakingly asinine.

Suggestions are welcome in the comments.

More like this

The Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics is currently holding a "Rapid Response Workshop" on Black Holes: Complementarity, Fuzz, or Fire?, August 19-30.
Show someone a piece of rotting food and their reaction will be visibly s
This is the physics book that's generating the most buzz just at the moment, by noted string theorist Leonard Susskind and George Hrabovsky, based on a general-audience course Susskind's been running for years.
In addition to the distinguished Dr. Hawking, the Perimeter institute lands nine very impressive distinguished research chairs, including some familiar quantum names. The presser:

How about Evo v Creat/ID ? at least as instances of science.