Top Eleven: Michelson and Morley

The next experiment in the Top Eleven is probably the most famous failed experiment of all time.

Who: Albert Michelson (1852-1931) and Edward Morley (1838-1923), American physicists.

When: Their first results were reported in 1887.

What: The famous Michelson-Morley experiment, which tried and failed to detect the motion of the Earth through the "luminiferous aether." At the time, light waves were believed to be disturbances in some medium that permeated all of space, and was fixed in an absolute sense. In this picture, objects moving through space should also be moving relative to the aether, which should cause an apparent change in the speed of light along the direction of motion.

i-fe24eee45893230cac27bf097830695e-sm_1887_intf_color.gifThe speed of light is gigantic, so it was widely believed that measuring the change in speed would be impossible, but Michelson came up with a way to do it, using a device now known as a "Michelson Interferometer," pictured at left. The idea is simple: you take a beam of light, and split it into two perpendicular paths of nominally equal length. Then you reflect the light back on itself, and re-combine the two beams. At the output of the apparatus, you will see a pattern of bright and dark lines ("fringes") due to the interference of the two light waves.

The exact pattern of fringes is extremely sensitive to the difference between the times taken for each of the two beams to make the round trip. If the time is different by half of the oscillation period of the light (about 10-15 seconds), you'll get bright fringes where you had dark ones, and vice versa. If you take this device and set it up with one arm pointed along the direction of the Earth's motion through the aether (about 30 km/s as it orbits the Sun), you'll see one pattern as the light on that path moves at a different speed than the light on the perpendicular path. If you then rotate the apparatus by 90 degrees, you switch the other arm into the direction of the Earth's motion, and you should see a shift in the fringes. The change in the speed of light is a small one (about 1/10,000th of the speed of light), but the interferometer is so sensitive, you should see something.

Michelson and Morley set up their apparatus on a heavy granite slab (to eliminate vibrations), and floated the slab in a vat of mercury (to allow smooth rotation-- OSHA didn't exist in 1887), and made a long series of measurements as they rotated the interferometer, and saw absolutely nothing. The shift they reported was consistent with zero, that is, with no change in the speed of light due to the Earth's motion through the aether.

Why It's Important: There are conflicting stories about whether Einstein was aware of the Michelson-Morley result or not, and whether he cared about it if he was aware of it, but the Michelson-Morley experiment played an important role in paving the way for the acceptance of Relativity. The simplest explanation of their null result is that there is no aether, and without the aether, there's no absolute rest frame.

Beyond that, it's one of the earliest examples of the technique of interferometry, which is incredibly useful for measuring small changes in position, or small phase shifts. There are dozens of different schemes for interferometric measurements, which can be used to measure everything from obvious physical quantities like position and rotation to gradients in the gravitational field, and even gravity waves. The Laser Interferometer Gravity Wave Observatory (LIGO) is in the process of building what is basically the world's largest Michelson interferometer in an effort to detect tiny expansions and contractions of space itself as a gravitational wave passes.

Reasons to Vote for Them:: Their null result brought about a dramatic shift in the way we view the world, and invented a crucial precision measurement technique. Also, Morley was a Williams grad (Class of 1860).

Reasons to Vote Against Them: Nostalgia for an absolute frame of reference, belief in aether dynamics.

(Michelson-Morley apparatus image stolen from this site, by way of the textbook companion site for my class this term.)

More like this

Yesterday's historical physics poll was about precision measurements. Who were those people, and why are they worth knowing about? As usual, we'll do these in reverse order of popularity... First up is Ole Rømer, a Danish astronomer who is no stranger to this blog, having been profiled as part of…
"It appears, from all that precedes, reasonably certain that if there be any relative motion between the earth and the luminiferous ether, it must be small; quite small enough entirely to refute Fresnel's explanation of aberration." -Albert A. Michelson In the 1880s, it was clear that something was…
In which we look at a slightly crazy-sounding proposal from my former boss, the experimental realization of which is getting close to completion. ------------ I spent more or less the entire first day of DAMOP a couple of weeks ago going to precision measurement talks. Most of these were relatively…
“The conclusions, the bizarre conclusions, emerge as though with the greatest of ease: the reasoning is unbreakable. It looks as though he had reached the conclusions by pure thought, unaided, without listening to the opinions of others. To a surprisingly large extent, that is precisely what he had…

Most sources I've seen say that he was born in Prussia. Of course, given the way Poland has flickered in and out of existence and shuffled side to side, it may well be that the relevant part of Prussia then is part of Poland now.

(My great-grandparents left eastern Poland in 1914 to avoid being drafted into the Russian army, which strikes me as an excellent tactical decision... We still have cousins over there, who my parents visited a couple of summers ago.)

Michelson was born in the so-called Prussian Poland, that is this part of Poland which during the partitions has been taken by Prussia.

Saying that Michelson was born in Prussia is like saying that Marie Curie-SkgÉ`²gÉ`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`²É`Ë`º7g 3¼=g 3¼A0; < < È8
Ê8 < È8 È8
Ê8 È8 È8
g >
Ë°6´c Í°Î Í°\¹

And that's "Morley", not "Morely".

By Vance Maverick (not verified) on 01 Feb 2006 #permalink

The US Naval Academy where this experiment was set up used to have a very nice display with the original instruments. I'm not sure where they moved it to since the building got flooded by a hurrican and completely gutted and renovated.

This experiment was performed at what is now Case Western Reserve University. They have a display in one of the campus buildings, but to be honest, I can't remember if it claimed to be the original instrument or just a mock-up.

By Eric Wallace (not verified) on 01 Feb 2006 #permalink

Well, if we're voting based on school affiliations, forget Morley and Williams; vote because Michelson taught at the Naval Academy, and I took freshman calculus in Michelson Hall there....

By Trent Goulding (not verified) on 01 Feb 2006 #permalink

One of the more impressive things about the experiment that might not occur to modern readers is that they used an oil lamp for their interferometer light. This was before electric filament lamps, before steady electric arc lamps, even before luminescent mantles. It's a shock for me, used to lasers and commercial optical tables and parts that you just screw together, to think about.

Light from lamps has a much shorter coherence length than laser light, so setting up a white-light interferometer is much more difficult than the laser interferometer that you might put together in an undergraduate lab.

Although being considered of historical importance, the Michelson - Morley experiment was completely unnecessary and pointless and its negative outcome could have been logically predicted on theoretical grounds alone: it is incorrect to set up an experiment that claims to examine the dependence of the speed of light on the velocity of the source/detector but can not properly define this velocity; the assumption of an 'absolute' reference frame on the other hand is a contradiction in terms as velocities are by definition relative (for the original experiment, the earth's movement around the sun was used, but there is no physical reason why the sun should be a preferred ('absolute') reference frame for a completely self-contained earthbound experiment; the same argument holds for any other reference frame as well)
The point is in fact that a light wave needs no carrying medium as it carries itself (to be more precise, according to Maxwell's Equations, the electric wave carries the magnetic wave and vice versa; it is somewhat ironic that Maxwell himself did obviously not realize this as he believed in the ether theory and a positive outcome of the Michelson-Morley experiment).


With Quantum AetherDynamics, we show that rather than space being empty, it is a fabric of quantum rotating magnetic fields with electromagnetic, electrostatic, and gravitational dipole structures. We call it the Aether, a tribute to the ancient term for space. Our Aether Physics Model is mathematically viable and bases on the same empirical data as established physics. However, the theory goes much further, becoming the "Grand Unification Theory" by unifying the four known interactions, or forces - the strong, electromagnetic, weak and gravitational forces. Using the principle of reductionism, the forces are unified by a simple set of general laws explainable by the fabric of space-time itself.

Among other accomplishments, from first principles the Aether Physics Model accurately predicts the relative strengths of the forces, and the 1s 'orbital' electron binding energy for all the elements. We show that the fundamental constants in physics are not just random values, but have an exact value based upon a quantum-scale, dynamic Aether. The Aether unit has a precise value equal to Coulomb's constant times 16pi². As a mathematician, you can appreciate the cosmic significance of this discovery. The Aether Physics Model is stunning in that it mathematically predicts and explains the measured values of physics with striking precision.

Since the first edition of this book appeared in 2004, we have achieved many major milestones. We were invited to present our flagship paper, A New Foundation for Physics (attached to this email), before distinguished scientists at the Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory conference held in London, in September, 2006. Our presentation was also covered by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The paper was published in the September/October 2006 edition of Infinite Energy Magazine. A favorable editorial appeared on United Press International. We are in ongoing communication with dozens of physics PhD's. We now have an Executive Board, a growing Advisory Board, and a dedicated team of volunteers.

Now that the Aether Physics Model quantifies the quantum structure and we have produced our first set of equations, the analysis must develop further until it explains all aspects of the atom. We should then be able to quantify the structural aspects of associated molecules. No other theory has ever come close to matching the scope and promise of the Aether Physics Model. Beyond a revolutionary paradigm of the fundamental laws and taking all the disciplines of science to a new level, practical applications of availing the Aether could include benefits to humanity such as anti-gravity, clean energy, and fully developing biotechnology and nanotechnology.

More is at: