Justifying Science Enrollments in One Sentence

I've talked before about the tension between the desire to encourage students to major in physics and the tight job market in academia. Every time I talk about ways to draw more students into physics, it seems that somebody pops up to call me irresponsible for trying to lure them into a dead-end career track, saying that we don't really need more physics majors.

Eugene Wallingford quotes the best concise response to this argument that I've heard:

Another colleague spoke eloquently of why we need to work hard to convince young people to enter the sciences at the university level. He said something to the effect that "Society does not need a lot of scientists, but the ones it does need, it needs very much -- and it needs them to be very good!"

That's it exactly.

More like this

The latest jobs in science post has prompted a lot of responses, several of them arguing that we need to expand the definition of acceptable careers for Ph.D. scientists. For example, there's Nicholas Condon in comments: When I hear this incessant handwringing about jobs in "science," it seems like…
In a comment to yesterday's post about the liberal arts, Eric Lund makes a good point: The best argument I have ever heard for doing scholarship in literature and other such fields is that some people find it fun. I single this out as a good point not because I want to sneer at the literary…
A while back, after handing in my manuscript and before SteelyKid, I asked readers to suggest blog topics. I got to a few of them already, but there's one more that I've been meaning to comment on, from tcmJOE: I'm a physics undergrad about to begin my final year, and while I'm still thinking of…
One of the many ancillary tasks associated with my job that I wish I was better at is the advising of students. More specifically, the advising of students who aren't like I was at that age. What I mean by that is that when I was a student, I didn't need to be convinced of the utility of liberal…

I think it's more than that.

We need physics majors who go on to be lawyers and businessmen and politicians and journalists and so forth. Not everybody who majors in English goes on to be an English professor. Yes, there is a lot of specialized knowledge (linear algebra, etc.) that you have to get under your belt to go through a physics major-- but there's no requirement that every physics major go on to graduate school.

Physics can be more than the esoteric field fully studiend and understood by only those who become professionals in it. There are parts of physics that the public is really interested in-- consider the fact that Stephen Hawking is almost a household name. I think that there is a thirst to understand out there, and it can only help to have more people major in physics who go on into the with a deeper understanding in it. I'd love to see people major in and love physics even if they don't go on to graduate school and become one of the very good scientists.

-Rob

"Society does not need a lot of scientists, but the ones it does need, it needs very much -- and it needs them to be very good!"

Ah, at long last a modern version of "Kill them all, let God sort them out!".

Maybe "society" (wazzdat, exactly?) needs some very, very good physicists (really? what for?). That still does not justify luring the vast majority (virtually all of them) who can not be those few needed physicists into a dead end (talk of a "dead-end career track" is wildly optimistic, presupposing as it does the existence of a career track).

A science PhD after four years college plus six years grad school emerged no better than break-even overall and with poor employment prospects. A starting 21-year old GED-bearing warrantless search and seizure Homeland Severity stormtrooper at LAX was paid $1.2 million during those 10 years. Who is the smart one?

Mihi cura futuri... at gunpoint.

Who is the smart one?

The one who spent ten years working on and studying things that he or she loved, expanding his or her mind and engaging in intellectual pursuits, rather than the one who spent ten years subsisting.

Even if it's more financially responsible to tread water as opposed to swim towards deep water, there is more to being human than making money.

I'd love to see the stigma against not going on in scientific research removed from grad students. (Yes, it exists.) And, as I said before, I'd love to see us fully celebrating physics majors who don't necessarily go on to graduate school.

-Rob