Inside the Writer's Studio

I scan the titles reviewed by the Onion AV Club through their RSS feed every week, and only click over there for things that look particularly interesting. I don't regularly check their feature stories, which is why I'm a week late in noticing that they have an interview with Donald Westlake, one of my very favorite fiction writers, talking about his career, the writing process, and his best-known characters:

DW: This sounds like a joke, but in a way, I mean it straight: Dortmunder's the most realistic stuff I do. Stark is much more of a romantic. The example that I've given in the past is, whenever anybody else's gang goes to rob a bank, there's always a place to park out front, but when Dortmunder goes to rob a bank, he has to park two blocks away and walk back. I submit that that's much more realistic.

As a bonus, there's a similar interview with Chuck Klosterman, one of my very favorite non-fiction writers:

People are more interested in reading bombastic ideas, whether they're positive or negative. Part of me has sort of lost interest in doing criticism because of that. I've always realized that criticism is basically autobiography. Obviously in my criticism, it's very clear that it's autobiography, but I think it's that way for everybody. Different critics go to different lengths to disagree with that sentiment, but ultimately, they're the person experiencing this art, and whatever judgment or taste they use is internal, and says more about them than about the record they're writing about.

It's a good week to read The Onion.

Tags

More like this

Tor.com / Science fiction and fantasy / Blog posts / Goodbye, Dortmunder: Donald Westlake's Get Real
Many years ago, when I was a kid growing up, I used to be a regular at the Mary Wilcox Memorial Library in town, and tore through most of their kids' books before mounting an assault on the adult section.
The 64 World Cup soccer (fotbol) matches started a week ago in 12 German cities and will continue until July 9. Three million soccer fans are expected from Europe and beyond.
Kate mentioned this story to me yesterday, and today, it's made the New York Times:

I think Mr Klosterman needs to read better critics. It's perfectly possible to base one's critique largely on external referents and to make clear where a personal reaction intrudes. Michael Dirda on literature springs to mind, and WD Snodgrass on poetry. I also like Roy Edroso on movies -- he's very personal, but makes those connections very clear. All criticism necessarily says something about the critic, but it only says more about the critic than his/her subject when it's done poorly.