1. principles
  2. Certain Principles

Certain Principles

By drorzel on December 30, 2006.

Matt Yglesias nails it when talking about faux-outrage over people complaining about the execution of Saddam Hussein:

Do these guys not understand the concept of principles? The point of the belief that all people are entitled to fair trials before receiving criminal sentences is that all people are entitled to fair trials. The point of the belief that capital punishment is immoral (not a belief I share, incidentally) is that it's always immoral. It's not as if Amnesty International is confused and doesn't understand that Saddam isn't a very sympathetic case. Rather, the point is that organizations committed to principles of human rights -- fair trials, no executions -- need to uphold those principles even when violating them sounds appealing. If they didn't, the groups wouldn't be standing for anything.

He's also got an excellent assessment of the execution itself:

Sad to see even something as justice for a major-league war criminal rendered tawdry by this administration.

Further blogging on this issue would be superfluous.

Tags
War

More like this

Richard Dawkins' tin ear regarding bioethics: The execution of Saddam Hussein as an "act of vandalism"
It is with a bit of trepidation that I write about this. The reason, for anyone who reads ScienceBlogs specifically or science blogs in general, should be obvious. Richard Dawkins is such a polarizing figure with a penchant for stirring things up with regards to the most deeply held beliefs of both…
U.S. MEDIA IGNORES WORLD CRITICISM OF DEATH PENALTY, TRIAL PROCESS: Vatican Calls Execution 'Tragic,' Blair Calls for 'End to Death Penalty WorldWide,' Conservative Times of London Labels Saddam's End 'Ethically Tainted'
In DC over the weekend, the conversational buzz at coffee shops, wine bars, and holiday parties has focused on the graphic reports of Saddam Hussein's execution. Friends from both sides of the political fence are using words like "banal," "barbaric," "creepy," and "grotesque" to describe their…
Where Rampant Scientism Takes You
When science replaces religion, it becomes more and more like religion, and in the minds of its worshipers, can justify the same sorts of inhumanities. Witness Richard Dawkins, todays leading worshiper of science, calling for deposed dictators to be used as guinea pigs, rather than executed (via…
Revisiting the Danish Cartoon Controversy
Came across these links while surfing and I have to say I'm very disappointed in a person and an organization I've respected in the past for their indefensible position on the issue. The first is Gary Trudeau, who is taken to task by Rogier van Bakel, and rightly so, for his recent comments on the…

In some sense this is an unusually clean case against the death penalty. Arguments in favor of this penalty concentrate many times on practical and semi-rational arguments (e.g. deterrence etc. etc.). In this case it is clear no practical purpose is served, certainly the peace and prosperity of the region will not benefit from this execution. This just brings to the front the real reasons for executions more generally, which are much more, how shall I put it, biblical...

I'm curious if it was televised, I'd be shocked but maybe not surprised.