Week of Science

A couple of bloggers have issued a challenge: a week of blogging about Just Science. I like RPM's description better than what's on the official site:

It boils down to this:

  • One week of science blogging and only science blogging.
  • At least one post a day of pure science content.
  • No blogging about anti-science -- no creationism, no anti-vaccination, no global warming denialists.

Just Science from February 5 through February 11.

I have two problems with this:

The first problem is that I don't know if I could go a whole week without blogging about academic issues, pop culture, or just general snark. None of that is really science, but they're important parts of what I do, for my own sanity if nothing else. (And Kate's, as she's spared some ranting when I blog about things...)

If you interpret the really important point to be the third bullet above (no anti-science), with pop-culture stuff sort of existing in limbo, it's easier to manage, but also kind of trivial. I hardly ever post about creationism, anti-vaccination, or global warming denialists, so by signing up, I'd be agreeing to spend a week doing what I usually do anyway.

Maybe I ought to offer to do a counter-stunt, and spend a week posting about nothing but anti-science?

Tags

More like this

Do you consider yourself a Science Blogger? You could be a hard blogging scientist, science journalist, student of science, or just a member of the general public with an interest in the scientific process. If you identify with any of these, I've got a challenge for you. It boils down to this:…
Today is the official beginning of the week of Just Science. The many blogs who signed up have pledged to post only about science for the week, and particularly not to post about "anti-science"-- no "religious people are stupid," no "alternative medicine is crap," no "global warming denialists are…
I've decided that the "intersession" we have between semesters is a cruel hoax. Though it promises a few weeks in which one might actually get some writing done, what it delivers is an endless list of tasks (many spawned by bureaucracy) that one must scurry to accomplish before the next semester…
There's something about the prefix "anti" that provokes all too many people, even some who consider themselves "skeptics," to clutch at their pearls and feel faint. Antivaccine? Oh, no, you can't say that! They're not "antivaccine"? Who could be so nutty as to be "antivaccine"? Even members of the…

Maybe I ought to offer to do a counter-stunt, and spend a week posting about nothing but anti-science?
Now, that's a good idea, also!
Easier stuff anyway. You can just take a subject and be sure you will have at least a week's posts: Say DaveScot :-)

I had the same reaction to the announcement: "You mean, blog about what I've been blogging about all along???" :) I almost never blog about anti-science stuff, except in passing.

I still think it's a good idea for some of the other science-centric blogs, many of which DO seem to over-focus at times on the anti-science stuff. It would make for an interesting change of approach, if nothing else. Instead of re-hashing the same arguments over and over again, for a mostly like-minded audience, there would be one week of celebrating what's cool and interesting about science, without lobbying figurative hand grenades at the "other side."

I had the same reaction to the announcement: "You mean, blog about what I've been blogging about all along???" :) I almost never blog about anti-science stuff, except in passing.

that's easy in for you guys, no one is interested in pseudo-physics :-)

It's a good thing that nothing interesting is happening on sunday at, say, 6pm est.