Quantum Gravity: Physics?

The post title is taken from the announcement for today's colloquium talk. The abstract:

Quantum gravity is the theory which is thought to underlie quantum theory and general relativity. I will introduce the subject, emphasizing recent results which suggest that spatial geometry is discrete. Such discrete geometry may have an observational signature, especially if it breaks Lorentz invariance. I will describe limits on such discrete geometry effects by astrophysical observations and will also argue that, in the not too distant future, quantum gravity may become physics and enjoy contact with observation and even experiment.

Well, at least there won't be anything controversial there...

(Actually, I suspect I may be the only one on the faculty who is up on the String Theory Wars. We used to have a visitor who was a string theorist, but he left quite a while ago, and none of the permanent faculty do research in cosmology or quantum gravity, so this is unlikely to ruffle that many feathers. Which is probably for the best...)

Tags

More like this

Yarn theory seems like a good way to go... I have been plowing through the comments and thought I'd do a meta-response, especially since no one is likely to be reading that far down any more. I should note that my comments on apples and physics hirings has in some ways been taken the wrong way, in…
In addition to the distinguished Dr. Hawking, the Perimeter institute lands nine very impressive distinguished research chairs, including some familiar quantum names. The presser: Nine Leading Researchers Join Stephen Hawking as Distinguished Research Chairs at Perimeter Institute in Ontario,…
#2 - Albert Einstein Einstein. When a person's name and photograph are both literal synonyms for genius, it's a pretty good sign they're among the greatest of the greats. But even if Einstein had not become the popular legend which lives on to this day, he'd still tower above the science of…
in which I triangulate on string theory and quantum gravity and ponder the "Trouble with Physics"... which is that physicists are hired the same way we pick apples at the supermarket. Look! Shiny! Big! Red! Finally, I finished Smolin's "Trouble with Physics". Hopefully in time for the paperback…

Not sure if this was implied, but this is not a string talk, rather it sounds like one of our loopy friends. Also sounds like you'll be treated to the standard Popper as a morality play pep talk, sorry...

Not sure if this was implied, but this is not a string talk, rather it sounds like one of our loopy friends.

Yeah. We don't have any of those on the faculty, either. I don't know that there will be anybody there with a strong prior opinion about the various competing models of quantum gravity.

Moshe: yes, the talk is given by Seth Major of Hamilton College, who did his Ph.D. work with Lee Smolin on q-deformed loop quantum gravity.

By Ambitwistor (not verified) on 20 Feb 2007 #permalink

Such discrete geometry may have an observational signature, especially if it breaks Lorentz invariance

"Allowed" anomalies must be consistent with prior observation in all venues at all scales. Discrete breaking of Lorentz Invariance is testable. It requires about $100 in consummables, an undergrad to grow opposite parity benzil crystals (J. Appl. Cryst. 4 333 (1971)); two days, two calorimeters.

A parity Eotvos experiment opposing space groups P3(1)21 and P3(2)21 single crystal alpha-quartz solid spheres will do. The experiment runs 90 days and costs ~$(US)250K. Cultured quartz is required for chemical purity and crystal lattice (mass distribution) perfection.

The speaker was apparently unaware of Hinchliffe's rule, which states that if the title of a talk or paper is in the form of a yes/no question, the answer is always no.

(Admittedly there is some dispute, as explained in the paper: "Is Hinchliffe's rule true?")