Trustees vs. Faculty

The Dean Dad posts lots of very interesting things that I end up not having time to link to-- you should be reading his blog every day, if you're interested in how academia operates. This one is too good to not link, though-- a discussion of Boards of Trustees and how they operate. I particualrly enjoyed this bit:

Boards are usually relatively small, and often dominated by a few strong personalities. Board members are typically not, um, experts in the innards of higher education, having earned their stripes in other fields of endeavor. Board service is usually only one of the obligations a Board member has, and usually not the primary one. The information the Board receives is necessarily partial and filtered, and will often be read through lenses that faculty would consider utterly bizarre. (In William Chace's memoir One Hundred Semesters, he recalls a Board member applying true corporate logic - as opposed to mere cost-consciousness - to argue for eliminating the social sciences altogether at one university. His argument was that you don't compete in fields you can't dominate, and the university was far from dominant in the social sciences. Chace had to at least appear to take him seriously, and gently introduce him to the notion of 'general education.') One of the most critical jobs for a President and/or Provost and/or VP is to translate the norms of higher ed to language that Board members can both understand and respect. Faculty who routinely bash administration have little clue how much effort is spent on this, and what would happen if it weren't.

Read, as they say, the whole thing.

Tags

More like this

Now, I have never studied at Harvard, and all universities are somewhat silly in their planning, but the release reproduced below the fold strikes me as one of the better proposals for undergraduate level tertiary education. It suggests that even science students might need to understand their…
In light of the ongoing flap about Iowa State University's decision to deny tenure to Guillermo Gonzalez, I thought it might be worth looking at an actual university policy on tenure -- the policy in place at my university -- and considering the sorts of judgments required by policies like this.…
Addendum published 14 July 2009 - I began this post in the spirit of revisiting the recent case of Emory University professor of psychiatry and radiology, Dr Douglas Bremner, who write the blog (and authored the book) Before You Take That Pill. Inside Higher Ed has the story behind the request by…
I wish I could claim responsibility for this essay but the mega-props go to Roy M Poses, MD, of the team blog, Health Care Renewal (blog mission statement: "Addressing threats to health care's core values, especially those stemming from concentration and abuse of power."). Last week, Roy wrote, "…

Professional management is about leadership not facts. Lower echelons interpret orders into actions and are held accountable for their failings. Management enters relationships to broker power (El Ultimo Presidente Boosh the Lesser, the Decider! Democracy, Haliburton; expendable assets.)

Universities exist wherein goo and dribbles of a liberal education are excised in favor of objective achievement. MIT, Caltech, RPI... are techno-slaves born and borne. Fraternities educate our socially interwoven leaders, sororities train their visible social adjuncts.

Every corporate stool has three legs: Labor, sacrifice, and the crushing burden of command. Compensation is commensurately awarded.

Uncle Al: "Universities exist wherein goo and dribbles of a liberal education are excised in favor of objective achievement. MIT, Caltech, RPI... are techno-slaves born and borne."

Are you suggesting that Caltech does not have world-class faculty in Humanities and Social Sciences?